Cerebral Alternatives for PMHNPs

If you’re a psychiatrist or psychiatric nurse practitioner, you’ve probably got a Psychology Today profile. Maybe it’s brought you a handful of patients. Maybe it’s collecting dust because you’re drowning in therapy-seeker inquiries that aren’t the right fit. Either way, you’re wondering: Is there a better way to fill my practice with actual medication management patients?

The short answer: Yes—but ‘better’ depends on what you’re optimizing for.

Psychology Today costs about $30/month and casts a wide net. That’s great if you’re just starting out or have time to screen inquiries. But if you’re tired of playing email tag with people who ghost after asking if you take their insurance, or if you want patients who specifically need psychiatric medication management (not weekly therapy), there are alternatives worth exploring.

Let’s break down what actually works for psychiatrists in 2026—from marketplace platforms like Zocdoc to full-service telepsychiatry companies like Cerebral and Talkiatry, and how pay-per-appointment models like Klarity Health compare. We’ll cover the real economics, what these platforms actually deliver, and how state regulations (licensing, telehealth laws, NP practice authority) affect which options work best for you.

The Core Problem: Psychiatrists Don’t Lack Patients—They Lack the Right Connections

Here’s what most provider-facing content won’t tell you: Over 50% of U.S. counties have zero practicing psychiatrists, and workforce projections show we’ll be short tens of thousands of providers by 2037. The bottleneck isn’t demand—it’s visibility and referral channels.

You could have a full practice in rural Montana or sit half-empty in downtown Manhattan, depending entirely on how patients find you. Many psychiatric patients self-refer (they Google ‘psychiatrist near me’ or search directories), unlike other specialties where physician referrals dominate. That makes your online presence—whether it’s a directory profile, a marketplace listing, or a platform partnership—crucial.

But there’s a catch: Most mental health directories were built for therapists, not prescribers. Psychology Today has 34+ million monthly visitors, but the vast majority are looking for weekly psychotherapy. If you’re a psychiatrist focused on medication management for ADHD, anxiety, or depression, you’re competing for attention with thousands of therapists—and fielding inquiries from people who need something you don’t offer.

That’s where alternatives come in.

Free consultations available with select providers only.

Grow your practice on Klarity

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

Start seeing patients

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

Psychology Today: The Baseline (and Why It’s Still Worth Having)

Let’s start with the standard. Psychology Today charges $29.95/month for a professional listing. You get a profile page, the ability to tag your specialty (Psychiatrist, PMHNP), list conditions treated, and note whether you accept insurance or offer telehealth.

The upside: It’s cheap, widely recognized, and can generate 5–15 qualified inquiries per month in competitive markets—which works out to roughly $2–6 per lead. That’s far less than typical Google Ads costs (where mental health keywords run $15–40+ per click, and most clicks don’t convert). In high-demand areas, psychiatrists who keep their profiles updated and mark ‘accepting new patients’ report even higher volumes.

The reality check: Psychology Today is passive marketing. Patients message you; you respond; you screen for fit; you try to schedule. There’s no built-in booking, no payment collection upfront, no guarantee the person who seemed interested will actually show up. You’ll get therapy seekers, people asking about insurance you don’t take, and casual inquiries from folks who messaged ten other providers at once.

Is it worth it? For $30/month, yes—if you maintain the profile. Update your photo and description every few months, toggle availability, and optimize your tags for conditions you actually treat. Think of it as your baseline online presence. But don’t expect it to fully book your practice on its own.

Common frustration: Many psychiatrists report spending hours responding to PT inquiries that go nowhere. One intake appointment can pay for a year’s subscription—but only if that patient actually books and shows up.

Zocdoc: Pay-Per-Booking for Insured Patients Who Want to Click and Schedule

Zocdoc flips the script: instead of a flat monthly fee, you pay $35–110 per new patient booking (varies by specialty and region). For mental health, it typically falls in the $50–80 range per new patient.

How it works: Patients search for psychiatrists by location, insurance, and availability, then book a time slot directly online. Zocdoc syncs with your calendar, sends appointment reminders, and handles the booking logistics. About 60% of Zocdoc’s providers accept government insurance, and even more take commercial plans—so you’re reaching patients who filter by ‘in-network’ and want immediate access.

The value prop: You only pay when someone actually books. No wasted subscription fees if you’re not getting patients. Zocdoc’s user base skews toward people who prefer digital booking (urban, tech-savvy, often younger professionals or busy parents seeking care for themselves or their kids). In cities like New York, Chicago, LA, Houston, and Philly, Zocdoc has become the default way insured patients find doctors—including psychiatrists.

The catch: That $50–80 per booking adds up fast. If you’re seeing 20 new patients a month through Zocdoc, you’re paying $1,000–1,600. Compare that to Psychology Today’s $30 flat fee. However, Zocdoc patients tend to show up—they’ve gone through the effort of booking online and they know you take their insurance, which reduces no-shows and mismatched inquiries.

Who should use it: Psychiatrists who:

• Take insurance (especially commercial plans like Blue Cross, Aetna, UHC)
• Practice in major metro areas where Zocdoc has traction
• Want to fill their schedule quickly with minimal back-and-forth
• Can afford the per-booking cost (typically break-even if your intake fee is $200+)

Who should skip it: Cash-pay only psychiatrists, or those in smaller markets where Zocdoc isn’t well-known. Also, if you’re already full and just need occasional backfill, paying $50+ per patient might not make sense.

Real talk from providers: Some New York doctors told Crain’s they stuck with Zocdoc despite hating the fees because ‘there isn’t an alternative’ with the same reach. Others see it as a necessary marketing tax—you’re essentially outsourcing patient acquisition to a platform that guarantees bookings.

BetterHelp and Therapy Platforms: Why They Don’t Work for Prescribers

BetterHelp serves over 5 million people and has 34,000+ therapists in its network. It’s the biggest online therapy platform in the world. So why isn’t every psychiatrist on it?

Because BetterHelp doesn’t support medication prescribing. It’s a therapy-only platform. Therapists on BetterHelp provide counseling via video, phone, or messaging—but they can’t write prescriptions.

If you’re a psychiatrist who also does psychotherapy and wants extra cash-pay clients, you could join BetterHelp as a therapist. But you’d be paid the same as any other counselor (often $30–50 per session hour, plus messaging compensation), which is far below what you’d earn doing medication management in private practice.

The takeaway: Therapy platforms like BetterHelp and Talkspace are extremely effective at patient acquisition—for therapy. They’re not viable alternatives for psychiatrists focused on prescribing. Don’t let the marketing fool you: ‘online mental health’ doesn’t automatically mean med management.

(Note: BetterHelp’s parent company has started partnering with prescribers for separate psychiatric services, but that’s not part of the core BetterHelp platform.)

Cerebral: High Volume, High Scrutiny, and What Went Wrong

Cerebral launched in 2020 as a subscription-based telepsychiatry service, offering online evaluations and medication delivery for ADHD, anxiety, and depression. At its peak during the pandemic, it was hiring psychiatrists and PMHNPs aggressively, promising a steady stream of patients and handled all the admin.

The model: Patients paid a monthly subscription ($85–300 depending on plan) for consultations and meds. Providers worked either part-time or full-time, paid per visit or salary, seeing patients through Cerebral’s app. The platform handled marketing, patient enrollment, telehealth tech, and even pharmacy fulfillment.

Why it appealed to providers: Instant patient volume. No need to find clients yourself. Work remotely, see patients across multiple states (if you held the licenses), and get paid without worrying about billing.

What went wrong: By mid-2022, Cerebral faced federal scrutiny over its prescribing practices—specifically, whether stimulants for ADHD were being prescribed too freely. In May 2022, the company announced it would stop prescribing Adderall and other Schedule II stimulants to new patients. Provider reviews on Indeed mention ‘constant change/restructuring,’ being ‘told how to prescribe,’ and high patient volume with insufficient clinical support. Average rating hovers around 2.9 out of 5, with complaints about workload, limited autonomy, and unclear protocols.

The reality for psychiatrists: Cerebral can give you a full caseload fast—but you’re working within their system, following their guidelines (which have shifted repeatedly), and dealing with the aftermath of reputational damage from regulatory issues. Some providers appreciated the volume and infrastructure; others felt their clinical judgment was second-guessed by non-clinical managers.

Current state (2026): Cerebral still operates but has pivoted toward therapy + non-controlled medications, and is working on compliance with evolving DEA telehealth rules (requiring in-person exams or partnerships for controlled substances). If you’re considering joining, vet their current prescribing protocols and provider satisfaction carefully.

Talkiatry: The ‘Virtual Group Practice’ Model—Pros and Cons

Talkiatry is a psychiatry-focused telehealth company that employs or contracts with psychiatrists and PMHNPs. Founded in 2020, it’s grown rapidly by offering in-network psychiatric care—a rarity in a field where many private psychiatrists are cash-only.

How it works: Talkiatry handles all patient acquisition, credentialing you on insurance panels, scheduling, billing, and admin. You see patients via their platform, typically 60-minute intakes and 30-minute follow-ups. They promise a full caseload within weeks of joining.

The advantages:

• Steady patient flow (no marketing on your part)
• Insurance accepted (reaching patients who can’t afford $300+ cash-pay intakes)
• Psychiatrist-led leadership (co-founded by an MD)
• Longer appointment times than some telehealth mills
• Multi-state practice opportunities (if licensed in multiple states)

The challenges:Provider reviews are mixed. Common themes from Indeed and Glassdoor:

• Base compensation around $120–150k full-time, with RVU-based bonuses that require high patient volume to achieve
• ‘Compensation isn’t adequate for amount of clinical and admin work’
• High patient load with limited administrative or clinical support
• Some report difficulty taking time off without impacting productivity bonuses
• Overall rating around 3.1–3.4 out of 5, with only 45–57% saying they’d recommend the company to a friend

Who it’s good for: Psychiatrists who want to build a full caseload quickly, don’t mind working within a group practice structure, and value the offloading of billing/admin. It’s especially useful if you want to work part-time or supplement an existing practice.

Who should think twice: If you’re entrepreneurial and value clinical autonomy, Talkiatry’s productivity expectations and protocols might feel restrictive. The pay structure means you’re trading higher patient volume (and lower per-patient revenue) for convenience.

The economics: Talkiatry essentially takes a cut of what insurers pay (or what patients pay) to cover their overhead—marketing, billing, credentialing, tech. You get a salary or per-visit rate that’s lower than what you’d collect independently, but with zero patient acquisition effort.

Klarity Health: Pay-Per-Appointment with Pre-Qualified Patients

Now let’s talk about Klarity Health, which positions itself differently than all the above.

The model: Klarity uses a pay-per-appointment structure (similar to Zocdoc) but specifically targets psychiatric medication management. There’s no monthly subscription fee—you pay only when you see a patient. The platform markets directly to people seeking treatment for conditions like ADHD, anxiety, insomnia, and depression, then matches them with licensed psychiatrists or PMHNPs in their state.

What makes it different:

1. Pre-qualified patients: By the time a patient reaches you, they’ve completed an intake questionnaire specifying what they’re seeking (medication evaluation, ongoing management, etc.). You’re not sorting through therapy inquiries or people who just want to ‘talk to someone.’

2. Upfront payment and deposits: Patients pay online before the appointment. For self-pay visits, Klarity collects a $10 non-refundable deposit at booking, then charges the remainder 24 hours before the appointment. This dramatically reduces no-shows compared to platforms where patients can book and ghost.

3. Built-in infrastructure: Klarity provides the telehealth platform, scheduling, billing, and e-prescribing tools. You don’t need separate software or staff to handle these tasks.

4. Both insurance and cash-pay: Unlike Psychology Today (mostly cash) or Zocdoc (mostly insurance), Klarity handles both types of patients, broadening your potential reach.

The economic trade-off: You pay per appointment (structure varies—could be a flat fee or revenue share). That fee is only incurred when you actually deliver care. Compare this to:

• Psychology Today: $30/month flat, but no guarantees on volume or quality
• Zocdoc: $35–110 per booking, but you’re competing on an open marketplace
• Cerebral/Talkiatry: No upfront costs, but lower per-patient compensation and less autonomy

The value proposition: Instead of spending $3,000–5,000/month gambling on marketing channels (Google Ads, SEO agencies, directory subscriptions), you pay a predictable amount only when a qualified patient books with you. That’s guaranteed ROI—you’re not risking money on clicks that don’t convert or listings that yield nothing.

Who should consider Klarity:

• Psychiatrists or PMHNPs who want to grow their practice without upfront marketing spend
• Providers comfortable with ADHD, anxiety, depression, insomnia—Klarity’s core focus areas
• Those tired of screening mismatched leads from general directories
• Providers looking for telehealth infrastructure without building it themselves

Who might prefer other options:

• If you’re already full and just need occasional patients, a low-cost directory might suffice
• If you strongly prefer in-person care or don’t want telehealth-only patients
• If you want to build your personal brand and maintain full control over all patient touchpoints (some providers prefer the independence of running everything themselves)

The Real Economics: What Does Patient Acquisition Actually Cost?

Let’s cut through the noise with some honest math.

The myth: You’ll sometimes see claims that acquiring a psychiatric patient costs ‘$30–50’ through DIY marketing. That’s nonsense unless you’re counting only the ad spend for one successful conversion—and ignoring:

• Agency/consultant fees (if you hire help)
• Staff time handling and qualifying leads
• No-shows from cold leads
• Months of SEO investment before seeing results
• Failed campaigns and wasted budget

The reality: Acquiring a qualified psychiatric patient through traditional channels typically costs $200–500+ when you factor in all costs:

• Google Ads: Mental health keywords cost $15–40+ per click. If your conversion rate is 5% (optimistic), you’re paying $300–800 per booked patient. Most solo practices don’t have the expertise to run profitable PPC campaigns—they either hire an agency ($1,500+/month) or waste budget testing.

• SEO: Takes 6–12 months of consistent investment (content creation, technical optimization, link building) before generating meaningful patient flow. Hiring an SEO agency runs $2,000–5,000/month. DIY is cheaper but requires skills most providers don’t have.

• Directory listings: Psychology Today is $30/month (great deal if it works), but GoodTherapy, Zencare, and others add up. Zocdoc is $35–110 per booking. If you’re running multiple listings, monthly costs stack.

Platform economics:

• Psychology Today: ~$360/year. If you get 5 patients from it annually, that’s $72 per patient. But many get fewer—or more.
• Zocdoc: $50–80 per patient (average). Guaranteed booking, but cuts into margins.
• Klarity: Pay-per-appointment (structure varies by provider agreement). The key difference: you only pay when revenue is coming in, and the patient is pre-qualified.

Why pay-per-appointment models make sense: You’re shifting the risk. Instead of paying upfront for ads, SEO, or subscriptions that might work, you pay when a patient actually books and shows up. For busy providers or those without marketing expertise, that’s a huge advantage.

The ROI calculation: Let’s say your initial psychiatric evaluation is $250. If a platform charges you $50 per new patient, you net $200 on the intake. If that patient continues for monthly follow-ups ($150 each), you’re building a recurring revenue stream. One patient = $200 initial + (12 × $150) = $2,000 annual value, for a $50 acquisition cost. That’s a 40:1 return.

Compare that to spending $3,000/month on marketing with uncertain results, and you see why many providers are moving toward performance-based models.

State-by-State: How Regulations Affect Your Options

Your state’s licensing and telehealth laws matter—a lot. Here’s what you need to know for the major markets:

California

• Licensing: Not in the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact—you need a full CA license to treat CA patients (no shortcuts)
• NP Independence: PMHNPs gain full practice authority starting January 1, 2026 (AB 890). Until then, newer NPs need physician collaboration.
• Telehealth: No special out-of-state registration. You must be CA-licensed. No additional controlled substance restrictions beyond federal law.
• Market: High demand in metros (LA, SF), severe shortages in rural areas. Heavy competition online. Psychology Today and Zocdoc both popular. Platforms targeting ADHD/anxiety do well given the tech worker population.

Texas

• Licensing: Part of the IMLC (easier for MDs to get licensed)
• NP Independence: PMHNPs must have physician supervision/collaboration to prescribe (no independent practice)
• Telehealth: Allowed; out-of-state providers need TX license. Follows federal controlled substance rules.
• Market: Huge, underserved population. Many patients seek telehealth because local options are limited. Insurance acceptance matters. Zocdoc and Talkiatry growing in urban areas; directories effective in suburbs/rural.

Florida

• Licensing: Part of IMLC and offers out-of-state telehealth registration (you can see FL patients without full FL license if you register)
• NP Independence: PMHNPs excluded from autonomous practice—still need physician collaboration
• Telehealth Controlled Substances: Florida explicitly permits prescribing Schedule II meds via telehealth for psychiatric treatment (rare and valuable exception)
• Market: Massive demand (growing population, retirees, ADHD treatment-seeking adults). Very telehealth-friendly. Platforms like Cerebral and Klarity had huge presence here. Easiest state for out-of-state prescribers to tap into remotely.

New York

• Licensing: Not in IMLC (full NY license required)
• NP Independence: Experienced PMHNPs (3,600+ hours) can practice without written agreement, extended through July 1, 2026
• Telehealth: No out-of-state shortcuts. Strong parity laws. Follows federal controlled substance rules.
• Market: NYC is saturated; upstate is underserved. Zocdoc essential in NYC for insured patients. Psychology Today yields private-pay leads. BetterHelp/Talkiatry have huge user bases.

Pennsylvania

• Licensing: Part of IMLC
• NP Independence: PMHNPs require physician collaboration (no FPA law passed yet)
• Telehealth: New Telemedicine Act passed 2024, formalizing coverage and guidelines
• Market: Philadelphia/Pittsburgh have providers; rural PA is severely underserved. Telehealth critical for reaching central PA. Psychology Today and insurance directories common.

Illinois

• Licensing: Part of IMLC
• NP Independence: PMHNPs with 4,000+ hours can obtain full practice authority
• Telehealth: Strong parity laws; no special license needed beyond IL license
• Market: Chicago has competition but still high demand. Downstate underserved. Zocdoc active in Chicago. Many independent PMHNP practices thanks to FPA.

The practical impact:

• If you’re licensed in Florida, you can see patients via telehealth easily (even from out of state) and prescribe controlled substances for psych conditions—making platforms like Klarity or Cerebral highly viable.
• If you’re in Texas or Pennsylvania, you’ll have an easier time getting licensed via IMLC, but PMHNPs need supervision, which might limit your independent practice options.
• If you’re in New York or California, you’re locked into those states unless you get additional licenses (no shortcuts)—but those are huge markets.

Comparison Table: Psychology Today vs. Zocdoc vs. Klarity vs. Talkiatry

Which Option Is Right for You?

Start with Psychology Today ($30/month) as your baseline. It’s cheap, it’s where patients look, and even a few inquiries can pay for itself.

Add Zocdoc if you:

• Take insurance
• Practice in a major metro (NYC, LA, Chicago, Houston, etc.)
• Can absorb the $50–80 per booking cost
• Want to fill your schedule fast with tech-savvy, insured patients

Consider Klarity if you:

• Focus on medication management (ADHD, anxiety, depression, insomnia)
• Want pre-qualified patients without upfront marketing spend
• Prefer pay-for-performance over subscriptions or ads
• Need telehealth infrastructure but don’t want to build it yourself

Join a platform like Talkiatry if you:

• Want a full caseload immediately with zero patient acquisition effort
• Don’t mind working within a group practice structure
• Value offloaded admin (credentialing, billing, scheduling)
• Are willing to trade higher per-patient revenue for convenience and volume

Skip therapy platforms (BetterHelp, Talkspace) unless you specifically want to do therapy-only work for lower rates.

Avoid platforms with regulatory baggage (like Cerebral’s stimulant prescribing controversies) unless they’ve clearly resolved their compliance issues and provider satisfaction has improved.

The Bottom Line: Marketing vs. Platforms

The real question isn’t ‘Which directory is best?’ It’s ‘Do I want to market my practice or join a platform?’

Marketing (directories, ads, SEO):

• Pros: You control everything. Build your brand. Keep full revenue per patient.
• Cons: Takes time, money, and expertise. Requires ongoing effort. Results vary wildly.

Platforms (Klarity, Talkiatry, etc.):

• Pros: Instant patient flow. Infrastructure provided. Pay only for results (or get salary). Minimal marketing effort.
• Cons: Less autonomy. Platform takes a cut (directly or via lower compensation). Patients may see you as ‘part of the platform’ rather than building your personal practice brand.

Most successful psychiatrists do both: maintain a Psychology Today profile and maybe run some local SEO for their private practice brand, and partner with a platform to fill remaining slots or expand into telehealth without the overhead.

The worst strategy? Doing nothing and hoping referrals magically appear. In 2026, patients expect to find you online. Whether that’s through a $30/month directory, a $50-per-booking marketplace, or a pay-per-appointment platform like Klarity, you need to be where patients are looking—and make it easy for them to book with you.

Take the Next Step

If you’re ready to move beyond hoping your Psychology Today profile pays off:

• Audit your current patient acquisition: How many new patients came from each source last quarter? What did each actually cost (time + money)?
• Test one new channel: If you’ve only done Psychology Today, try Zocdoc for three months in a metro market. If you want pre-qualified med management patients, explore Klarity.
• Track ROI religiously: Don’t just count patients—track cost per patient, no-show rates, and lifetime value (initial visit + follow-ups).

The psychiatrists who build full, sustainable practices in 2026 aren’t just good clinicians—they’re strategic about patient acquisition. Whether you choose a directory, a marketplace, or a platform, the key is matching the channel to your practice model, your state’s regulations, and your tolerance for marketing complexity.

And if you want the simplest path? Partner with a platform that only charges you when patients actually show up. That’s the model that’s reshaping psychiatric practice—and it’s working.

Interested in joining Klarity’s provider network? Visit Klarity Health to learn more about our pay-per-appointment model, pre-qualified patient matching, and telehealth infrastructure built specifically for psychiatric prescribers.

Sources

1. Osmind. ‘How to Attract More Patients to Your Psychiatry Practice.’ Osmind Blog, 2023. https://www.osmind.org/blog/how-to-attract-more-patients-psychiatry-practice

2. Sivo Health Marketing. ‘How Much Does a Psychology Today Listing Cost?’ July 17, 2025. https://blog.sivo.it.com/professional-practice-marketing/how-much-does-a-psychology-today-listing-cost/

3. Emitrr. ‘Zocdoc Pricing: Is Zocdoc Worth It for Your Practice?’ Updated November 14, 2025. https://emitrr.com/blog/zocdoc-pricing/

4. Fierce Healthcare. ‘Some New York doctors unhappy about Zocdoc’s new pricing model.’ August 28, 2019. https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/practices/some-new-york-doctors-unhappy-about-zocdoc-s-new-pricing-model-company-says-it-was

5. The Mental Desk. ‘Can BetterHelp Therapists Prescribe Medication?’ Updated March 20, 2024. https://www.thementaldesk.com/can-betterhelp-therapists-prescribe-medication/

Source:

• https://www.osmind.org/blog/how-to-attract-more-patients-psychiatry-practice#:~:text=The%20bottleneck%20isn%27t%20demand,of%20needed%20supply%20by%202037
• https://blog.sivo.it.com/professional-practice-marketing/how-much-does-a-psychology-today-listing-cost/#:~:text=A%20professional%20listing%20on%20Psychology,connecting%20them%20with%20potential%20clients
• https://www.osmind.org/blog/how-to-attract-more-patients-psychiatry-practice#:~:text=Why%20this%20matters%3A%20Psychology%20Today,you%20appear%20in%20search%20results
• https://www.osmind.org/blog/how-to-attract-more-patients-psychiatry-practice#:~:text=in%20competitive%20markets%20report%205,you%20appear%20in%20search%20results
• https://emitrr.com/blog/zocdoc-pricing/#:~:text=range%20between%20%2435%20and%20%24110,specialty%20as%20well%20as%20region
• https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250122456222/en/BetterHelp-Surpasses-5-Million-People-Benefiting-from-Online-Therapy-Service#:~:text=Service%20www,surpassed%205%20million%20people%20across
• https://www.thementaldesk.com/can-betterhelp-therapists-prescribe-medication/#:~:text=Right%20now%2C%20BetterHelp%20doesn%E2%80%99t%20provide,permission%20to%20give%20out%20medicines
• https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Talkiatry/reviews?fcountry=ALL&fjobtitle=Psychiatrist#:~:text=
• https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Cerebral/reviews#:~:text=Working%20at%20Cerebral%3A%20329%20Reviews,been%20with%20Cerebral%20for%2030
• https://support.helloklarity.com/support/solutions/articles/66000487673-is-there-a-membership-or-monthly-subscription-fee-#:~:text=Klarity%20does%20not%20have%20membership,package%20options%20available%20for%20purchase