How to Start a Telehealth Narcolepsy Practice in Georgia

So you’re thinking about treating narcolepsy patients via telehealth — maybe as a niche within your psychiatry or sleep medicine practice, or perhaps as your entire focus. Smart move. Narcolepsy is rare (~1 in 2,000–5,000 people), chronically undertreated, and most patients can’t find a local specialist who actually understands the condition. That’s where you come in.

But here’s the reality: building a successful telehealth narcolepsy practice isn’t just about clinical expertise. You’re navigating multi-state licensing mazes, controlled substance regulations that change by the month, patient acquisition costs that can kill your margins, and operational headaches like no-shows and insurance credentialing. This guide cuts through the noise and gives you the real operational playbook — what works, what’s expensive, and what you need to know before seeing your first patient.

Why Telehealth for Narcolepsy Makes Business Sense

Narcolepsy patients are desperate for specialists. Most live nowhere near a sleep center with narcolepsy expertise. They’ve been misdiagnosed for years (average is 8–15 years from symptom onset to diagnosis), bounced between PCPs who don’t understand excessive daytime sleepiness, and told they’re just lazy or depressed. When they finally get diagnosed, they need long-term medication management — stimulants, sodium oxybate, antidepressants for cataplexy — which requires a provider who knows the protocols.

Telehealth solves their access problem. A patient in rural Montana can see you in California. A college student in Florida can consult with you in New York. You’re not limited by geography — you’re limited by where you hold licenses. And because narcolepsy is chronic, these become long-term patients with ongoing medication needs, not one-and-done consultations. That’s recurring revenue.

The catch? You need licenses in every state where patients are located at the time of the visit. Which brings us to the first operational hurdle…

Free consultations available with select providers only.

Grow your practice on Klarity

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

Start seeing patients

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

Multi-State Licensing: Your Biggest Upfront Investment

Here’s what nobody tells you: Getting licensed in multiple states isn’t just paperwork — it’s a 6–12 month project that costs $3,000–$10,000+ in fees, background checks, and administrative time before you see a single patient.

For physicians (MDs/DOs), the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) is your best friend. As of 2026, 37 states plus DC and Guam participate. If you already hold a license in one IMLC state and meet the requirements, you can apply for licenses in other member states through one streamlined application. Texas, Florida, Illinois, and Pennsylvania are all IMLC members — meaning you can get licensed in these high-population states relatively quickly (4–8 weeks vs. 3–6 months going state by state).

But here’s the problem: California and New York aren’t in the IMLC. These are two of the largest markets for telehealth psychiatry, and you’re stuck with their traditional licensing timelines. California’s Medical Board advises applying at least six months before you need the license. New York takes 3–6 months and has extensive credential verification. Both require full background checks, fingerprinting, and detailed work history. You can’t rush this.

For PMHNPs and advanced practice nurses, it’s even more complicated. There’s no equivalent APRN compact for multi-state prescriptive authority. You need to understand each state’s scope-of-practice laws:

• California (2026): Experienced NPs can now practice independently under AB 890. After 3 years of supervised practice, you can become a ‘104 NP’ and run your own practice without physician oversight. This is new — the first 104 NPs were certified in 2026.

• Texas: Still requires a physician delegation agreement for all NP prescribing. You cannot run a solo NP telepractice in Texas — you need a Texas-licensed MD on paper, even if you’re doing all the clinical work.

• Florida: Allows NP independence only in primary care (family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine). Psychiatric NPs still need physician collaboration. And if you’re treating narcolepsy (a neurological condition, not psychiatry), you’re in a gray area.

• New York: After 3,600 hours of practice, NPs can practice completely independently with no collaborative agreement. This is huge for telehealth — you can run a solo narcolepsy clinic in NY without an MD partner.

• Pennsylvania: Still requires physician collaboration. Multiple bills for NP independence have failed. You need a PA-licensed physician to co-sign your collaborative agreement.

• Illinois: Offers Full Practice Authority after 4,000 hours + 250 CE hours. Many Illinois NPs now have FPA licenses and can practice independently, including prescribing controlled substances.

The financial reality: If you’re launching in 3 states, budget $1,500–$3,000 per state for licensing fees, plus $500–$1,000 for background checks, fingerprinting, and notarization. Add another $2,000–$5,000 for DEA registrations and state controlled substance licenses (required in most states). You’re at $7,500–$15,000 before seeing a patient. And licenses require renewal every 1–2 years with continuing education requirements that vary by state.

The Controlled Substance Problem (And Current Workarounds)

Most narcolepsy treatments are Schedule II or IV controlled substances: modafinil, armodafinil, Adderall, Ritalin, sodium oxybate (Xyrem/Xywav). Federal law historically required an in-person exam before prescribing controlled substances via telehealth.

The good news: the DEA and HHS extended COVID-era telehealth flexibilities through December 31, 2026. You can initiate and continue controlled substance prescriptions via telehealth without an initial in-person visit. This is critical for narcolepsy telehealth — without it, the business model doesn’t work.

The bad news: This is a temporary extension. The DEA is drafting permanent rules, and nobody knows what they’ll look like. The flexibilities could end in 2027, potentially requiring in-person exams for new controlled substance prescriptions. If that happens, you’ll need to either see patients in person initially (killing the pure telehealth model) or partner with local providers for the initial exam.

State-specific traps: Even with the federal waiver, some states impose additional restrictions. Florida’s telehealth law allows Schedule II stimulants to be prescribed via telemedicine only for psychiatric disorders. Narcolepsy is classified as a neurological disorder, not psychiatric — which means out-of-state telehealth providers using Florida’s expedited registration (instead of a full FL license) cannot legally prescribe narcolepsy stimulants to Florida patients. You need a full Florida license to manage narcolepsy medications there.

Always verify current DEA and state medical board rules before prescribing controlled substances across state lines. One misstep here can trigger an audit or license complaint.

Cash Pay vs Insurance: The Revenue Model Decision

Here’s the psychiatric practice reality: only about 55% of psychiatrists accept private insurance, compared to 89% of other specialists. Why? Low reimbursement rates ($100–$150 for a 30-minute follow-up in many plans), administrative nightmares (prior authorizations, claim denials, credentialing delays), and enough demand that providers can fill their schedules with cash patients.

Narcolepsy is similar. You have three basic options:

Option 1: Cash-Only Practice

Pros:

• You set your rates ($200–$400 for initial consults, $150–$250 for follow-ups)
• Immediate payment — no chasing claims or dealing with denials
• No credentialing delays (3–6 months per insurance network)
• Longer visits if needed without worrying about CPT code limits
• Patients can submit superbills to their insurance for out-of-network reimbursement

Cons:

• Smaller patient pool — not everyone can afford $200+ out-of-pocket
• You’ll spend time helping patients navigate out-of-network benefits and medication coverage
• Some insurance plans won’t cover medications prescribed by out-of-network providers (verify this per payer)
• Patients may expect premium service (24/7 access, instant responses) for cash rates

Option 2: Insurance Panels

Pros:

• Broader patient access — anyone with that insurance can see you with minimal out-of-pocket cost
• Higher patient volume — insurance directories, PCP referrals, platform listings all funnel patients to in-network providers
• Medication prior authorizations may be easier when you’re in-network
• Many states now mandate telehealth payment parity (same rate as in-person)

Cons:

• Lower reimbursement — $100–$150 per visit vs. $200+ cash
• Administrative overhead: billing staff or service ($500–$2,000/month), credentialing time, claim rejections
• Prior authorizations consume significant unpaid time (especially for Xyrem/Xywav, which require extensive REMS program documentation)
• Insurance audits and documentation requirements

The economic math: If you see 20 patients/month at $200 cash (after ~25% no-show rate from 27 bookings), that’s $4,000/month revenue. If you see 40 patients/month at $125 insurance reimbursement (higher volume because you’re in-network), that’s $5,000/month — but subtract $500–$1,000 for billing expenses. The difference isn’t huge until you scale.

Option 3: Hybrid Model (The Smart Play)

Most successful narcolepsy specialists do some combination:

• Accept 2–3 major insurance plans (UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, BlueCross) that have reasonable reimbursement and common patient coverage
• Remain out-of-network for others but provide superbills
• Offer cash-pay for specialized services (medication consultations, disability paperwork, letters for accommodations)

This maximizes volume while maintaining revenue per visit. You capture patients who need insurance for expensive narcolepsy medications (Xyrem can cost $10,000+/month without coverage), while still seeing cash patients who value convenience and expertise.

Patient Acquisition: The Real Economics (Not What You’ve Been Told)

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: how much does it actually cost to acquire a narcolepsy patient?

You’ll see blog posts claiming you can acquire patients for ‘$30–50’ through SEO or Google Ads. That’s fantasy. Here’s the reality:

DIY Marketing (SEO, Google Ads, Directories):

• Google Ads for ‘narcolepsy doctor [city]’ or ‘telehealth psychiatrist’ run $15–$40+ per click
• Most clicks don’t convert — you need 50–100 clicks to get one booked appointment
• That’s $750–$4,000 in ad spend per patient, and that doesn’t include the 3–6 months of testing campaigns to figure out what works
• SEO takes 6–12 months of consistent investment (content, backlinks, technical optimization) before generating meaningful patient flow. Most solo providers don’t have the budget or expertise to do this effectively.
• Directory listings like Psychology Today (~$30/month) generate 5–15 inquiries per month in competitive markets, but you still need to convert those inquiries (phone screening, follow-up emails, scheduling friction). Many don’t book.
• Zocdoc charges $35–$100+ per new patient booking (and you pay even if the patient no-shows)

When you factor in ALL costs — agency fees if you hire a marketer ($1,500–$5,000/month), ad spend testing, staff time to qualify leads, no-show rates from cold leads, and failed campaigns — acquiring a qualified psychiatric patient through DIY marketing typically costs $200–$500+.

And here’s the kicker: that’s per patient. If 30% of new patients are one-time consultations (they don’t come back for ongoing care), you’re spending $200–$500 to get $200–$400 in revenue. The math only works if you retain patients long-term.

The Platform Alternative: Pay Only When You See Patients

This is where platforms like Klarity Health change the economics. Instead of gambling $3,000–$5,000/month on marketing with uncertain results, you pay a standard fee only when a qualified patient books an appointment with you. No upfront marketing spend. No monthly subscriptions. No wasted ad dollars on clicks that don’t convert.

Here’s what that actually means for your practice:

Pre-qualified patient flow: Patients on Klarity’s platform are already matched to your specialty (narcolepsy, ADHD, depression, etc.) and availability. You’re not fielding inquiries from people who don’t have insurance you accept or are looking for something you don’t treat.

No marketing risk: Instead of spending $4,000 in a month on Google Ads hoping to book 8 patients (and maybe getting 3), you pay per appointment booked. If you see 10 patients, you pay for 10. If you see 2, you pay for 2.

Built-in telehealth infrastructure: No separate platform fees for Zoom, no EMR subscription you’re not using, no separate billing system. Everything’s integrated — scheduling, video visits, e-prescribing, patient communication.

Flexible scheduling: You control when you’re available. Want to do 5 hours a week while ramping up your practice? Fine. Want to go full-time with 30 hours? Also fine. You only see patients when you’ve set availability.

Insurance and cash-pay patients: The platform handles both. Some patients use insurance (you get credentialed through Klarity’s existing payer relationships), others pay cash. You’re not locked into one model.

The ROI difference: Let’s say Klarity charges a $40 booking fee per new patient (similar to Zocdoc’s model). You see 15 new patients in a month — that’s $600 in acquisition cost. If you’re charging $200 per visit and 80% of those patients show up (12 patients), you generate $2,400 in revenue. Subtract the $600 in fees, and you’re at $1,800 net before your time/overhead. Compare that to spending $3,000 on ads with no guarantee of bookings.

The key insight: guaranteed ROI vs. gambling on marketing channels. Most providers, especially those starting out or scaling, would rather pay a predictable fee per confirmed patient than risk thousands of dollars per month on marketing that might not work.

No-Shows: The Silent Profit Killer

Missed appointments are brutal for any practice, but especially for a niche narcolepsy telehealth clinic. You’ve blocked an hour for a new patient evaluation. They don’t show. That’s $200–$400 in lost revenue you can’t recover, plus the prep time reviewing their sleep study results.

The data: Sleep medicine clinics report no-show rates around 20%. New patients are worse — 30.5% no-show rates vs. 18.3% for established patients. Younger adults and uninsured patients have higher no-show rates. Narcolepsy patients may oversleep through early morning appointments (scheduling afternoon slots can help).

Telehealth helps: Switching to telehealth typically reduces no-show rates from 20–30% in-person to 10–18% virtual. No travel barriers, easier to attend from home or work, less friction to showing up.

But telehealth introduces new risks: Technical issues (forgot the Zoom link, device problems), and a certain casualness — patients may treat a video visit as less ‘firm’ than an in-person appointment they drove 30 minutes for.

Mitigation strategies:

• Automated reminders: Text/email 48 hours before, then 2 hours before. This jogs memory and prompts advance cancellations.
• Credit card on file: Charge a no-show fee ($50–$100) if they miss without 24-hour notice. This enforces accountability.
• Overbooking: Some practices book 1–2 extra slots per day expecting cancellations. Risky if everyone shows up, but can fill gaps.
• Patient-friendly scheduling: Avoid early mornings for uncontrolled narcolepsy patients. Late morning or early afternoon aligns with their alert periods.
• Technical prep: Send login instructions 24 hours ahead, offer a test connection, have a backup phone number if they can’t connect.

Track your no-show rate monthly. If it’s above 15%, you need better systems.

State-by-State Operational Cheat Sheet

Here’s what you need to know for the six highest-priority telehealth markets:

California

• Licensure: Not in IMLC — expect 6+ months for full MD license. NPs can practice independently as of 2026 (AB 890 ‘104 certification’ after 3 years supervised).
• Controlled substances: No state-specific telehealth restrictions beyond federal law.
• Telehealth parity: Yes — private insurers must reimburse telehealth at in-person rates.
• Gotcha: Slow licensing. Apply early. No telehealth-only license option.

Texas

• Licensure: IMLC member for MDs (2–3 months). NPs require physician delegation agreement — cannot practice independently.
• Controlled substances: Telehealth allowed. No in-person requirement.
• Telehealth parity: Yes.
• Gotcha: NP rules are strict. Supervising physician must be licensed in Texas. Also need TX DEA registration and TX controlled substance license.

Florida

• Licensure: IMLC member for MDs. Out-of-state telehealth registration available BUT cannot prescribe controlled substances except for psychiatric treatment (narcolepsy doesn’t qualify). You need a full FL license to treat narcolepsy.
• Controlled substances: State law limits Schedule II stimulants via telehealth to psychiatric disorders only.
• Telehealth parity: Yes.
• Gotcha: Don’t fall for the ‘quick telehealth registration’ shortcut — it doesn’t work for narcolepsy med management. Get the full license.

New York

• Licensure: Not in IMLC — 3–6 months for MD license. NPs can practice independently after 3,600 hours (effectively no collaboration requirement as of 2023).
• Controlled substances: Must check state prescription monitoring program before prescribing. E-prescribing mandate for all scripts.
• Telehealth parity: Yes — one of the strongest parity laws.
• Gotcha: Extensive credential verification during licensing. Large market, high demand, but competitive.

Pennsylvania

• Licensure: IMLC member for MDs (2–4 months). NPs require physician collaborative agreement (no independent practice).
• Controlled substances: No special telehealth restrictions.
• Telehealth parity: Major insurers cover, but no strong state mandate.
• Gotcha: NP collaboration agreement must be filed with both Board of Nursing and Board of Medicine.

Illinois

• Licensure: IMLC member for MDs. NPs can obtain Full Practice Authority after 4,000 hours + 250 CE hours (allows independent practice/prescribing).
• Controlled substances: Need IL controlled substance license in addition to DEA.
• Telehealth parity: Yes — Telehealth Act mandates equal reimbursement.
• Gotcha: FPA application for NPs is separate process after meeting requirements (~30 days processing).

Building Your Narcolepsy Telehealth Practice: Operational Checklist

Phase 1: Legal & Regulatory (Months 1–6)

• [ ] Identify target states based on patient demand and licensing complexity
• [ ] Apply for state medical/APRN licenses (IMLC if eligible)
• [ ] Obtain DEA registration and state controlled substance licenses
• [ ] Register with each state’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
• [ ] Verify malpractice insurance covers multi-state telehealth and controlled substance prescribing
• [ ] Develop HIPAA-compliant informed consent for telemedicine

Phase 2: Technology & Infrastructure (Months 3–6)

• [ ] Choose telehealth platform (HIPAA-compliant video, e-prescribing for controlled substances/EPCS)
• [ ] Set up EMR with narcolepsy-specific templates (sleep logs, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, medication protocols)
• [ ] Configure secure patient portal for uploading sleep study results and records
• [ ] Establish referral network with sleep labs in target states (for ordering PSG/MSLT)
• [ ] Set up local lab partnerships (LabCorp, Quest) for blood work orders

Phase 3: Business Model & Payments (Months 4–6)

• [ ] Decide cash vs. insurance model (or hybrid)
• [ ] If insurance: start credentialing process 3–6 months before launch (can’t bill without it)
• [ ] Set up credit card processing (Stripe, Square, or EMR-integrated payments)
• [ ] Define pricing: initial consult, follow-ups, medication management
• [ ] Create office policies: no-show fees, cancellation policy, after-hours contact

Phase 4: Clinical Workflow (Months 5–6)

• [ ] Build pre-visit patient intake forms (medical history, sleep questionnaires)
• [ ] Develop medication protocols for narcolepsy: stimulants, sodium oxybate (Xyrem/Xywav REMS enrollment), antidepressants for cataplexy
• [ ] Train on prior authorization process for Xyrem/Xywav and expensive meds
• [ ] Set appointment templates: 60-min initial consult, 30-min follow-ups, 15-min med checks
• [ ] Schedule patient-friendly times (avoid early mornings for narcolepsy patients)

Phase 5: Marketing & Patient Acquisition (Months 6+)

• [ ] Build professional website with narcolepsy SEO (blog content, FAQs, state-specific pages)
• [ ] List on provider directories (Psychology Today, Healthgrades, Zocdoc)
• [ ] Consider joining Klarity Health or similar platform for pre-qualified patient flow
• [ ] Develop referral relationships with neurologists, sleep centers, PCPs
• [ ] Reach out to patient advocacy groups (Narcolepsy Network, Wake Up Narcolepsy) for visibility

Phase 6: Operations & Scaling (Ongoing)

• [ ] Implement automated appointment reminders (48-hour and 2-hour)
• [ ] Track no-show rate monthly — adjust scheduling or policies if >15%
• [ ] Maintain state licenses and CME requirements (renewals every 1–2 years)
• [ ] Monitor patient acquisition cost per channel — double down on what works
• [ ] Consider hiring virtual assistant for scheduling, insurance verification, prior auths as you scale

The Bottom Line: Is Telehealth Narcolepsy Worth It?

If you’re willing to navigate the licensing complexity and upfront investment, yes — there’s a real business opportunity here. Narcolepsy patients desperately need specialists, and most live nowhere near one. Telehealth removes that barrier.

But this isn’t a ‘build it and they will come’ situation. You need:

• Multiple state licenses ($10,000–$15,000 initial investment, ongoing renewal costs)
• A viable patient acquisition strategy (directories, referrals, or a platform like Klarity that handles marketing)
• Strong operational systems (automated reminders, no-show policies, efficient documentation)
• Controlled substance compliance (DEA, state monitoring programs, EPCS for e-prescribing)
• A sustainable revenue model (cash-pay, select insurance panels, or hybrid)

The providers who succeed in this niche are the ones who treat it like a business, not just clinical work. Track your metrics: cost per patient acquired, no-show rate, patient retention after initial consult, average revenue per patient over 12 months. Adjust what isn’t working.

And if you want to skip the patient acquisition headaches entirely? Join a platform that pre-qualifies patients and handles the marketing for you. You pay per appointment instead of gambling thousands on ads. That’s how you actually build a profitable telehealth practice — by focusing on clinical care, not becoming a marketing expert overnight.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a separate license for each state where I treat telehealth patients?
Yes. You must hold an active medical or APRN license in every state where the patient is located at the time of the visit. The Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) can speed this up for physicians in 37 member states, but California and New York aren’t members. Budget 2–6 months and $1,500–$3,000 per state.

Can I prescribe controlled substances for narcolepsy via telehealth?
Currently yes, through December 31, 2026, thanks to federal COVID-era flexibilities extended by HHS/DEA. You can initiate and continue Schedule II stimulants and other controlled narcolepsy medications without an initial in-person exam. But this is temporary — permanent rules are pending. Some states (like Florida) have additional restrictions on telehealth prescribing of controlled substances, so verify state law.

What’s the real cost to acquire a new narcolepsy patient?
If you’re doing DIY marketing (Google Ads, SEO, directories), expect $200–$500+ per booked patient when you factor in all costs — ad spend, agency fees, staff time, no-shows, and failed campaigns. SEO takes 6–12 months before generating consistent patient flow. Platforms like Klarity Health use a pay-per-appointment model (similar to Zocdoc’s $35–$100 per booking), which removes upfront marketing risk — you only pay when a qualified patient actually books.

Should I take insurance or go cash-only?
Depends on your market and goals. Cash-only yields $200–$400 per visit with no credentialing delays or billing overhead, but limits patient pool. Insurance panels offer broader access and higher volume, but reimburse $100–$150 per visit and require billing staff. Most successful narcolepsy specialists do hybrid: accept 2–3 major insurers with decent reimbursement, stay out-of-network for others, and offer cash-pay for specialized services.

How do I handle no-shows in a telehealth practice?
Telehealth reduces no-show rates (typically 10–18% vs. 20–30% in-person), but you still need systems. Use automated reminders 48 hours and 2 hours before appointments, require credit card on file with a no-show fee ($50–$100), and schedule narcolepsy patients during their alert periods (avoid early mornings). Track your no-show rate monthly — if it’s above 15%, adjust your policies.

What if I’m a PMHNP — can I treat narcolepsy independently?
Depends on the state. California (2026), New York (after 3,600 hours), and Illinois (after 4,000 hours + CE) allow independent NP practice with full prescriptive authority. Texas, Florida (for psych), and Pennsylvania still require physician collaboration. Check each target state’s scope-of-practice laws and factor in supervising physician costs if required.

How long does it take to actually start seeing patients?
Realistically, 6–12 months from decision to first patient. Licensing takes 2–6 months per state (longer for California/New York). Insurance credentialing adds another 3–6 months if you’re going that route. Technology setup, website, and marketing can happen in parallel. If you join a platform like Klarity with existing infrastructure and credentialing, you can potentially start seeing patients within 2–3 months once your licenses are active.

Source Citations

1. HHS Press Release – ‘HHS & DEA Extend Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescribing Controlled Medications Through 2026’ (Jan 2, 2026) – www.hhs.gov

2. Medical Board of California – ‘License Application Processing Times’ (Updated Feb 5, 2026) – www.mbc.ca.gov

3. California Board of Nursing – AB 890 Implementation FAQs (Updated 2024) – rn.ca.gov

4. Foley & Lardner LLP – ‘Florida Telemedicine Prescribing of Controlled Substances’ (Apr 7, 2022) – www.jdsupra.com

5. J. Clin. Sleep Med. – ‘No-show rates to a sleep clinic: drivers and determinants’ (Sept 15, 2020) – pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Source:

• https://imlcc.com/information-for-states/#:~:text=Eligible%20physicians%20can%20qualify%20to,which%20they%20intend%20to%20practice
• https://www.mbc.ca.gov/Licensing/Physicians-and-Surgeons/Apply/processing-times.aspx#:~:text=application%20review,should%20consider%20the%20timeframes%20below
• https://imlcc.com/information-for-states/#:~:text=The%20Compact%20currently%20includes%2037,became%20operational%20in%20April%202017
• https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S5657#:~:text=Senate%20Bill%20S5657%202025,Details%20See%20Assembly%20Version%20of
• https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/dea-telemedicine-extension-2026.html#:~:text=person%20visit,while%20permanent%20rules%20are%20finalized
• https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-florida-law-allows-telemedicine-7862821/#:~:text=Some%20stimulant%20medications%20commonly%20prescribed,allowed%20under%20this%20new%20law
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3967759/#:~:text=The%20percentage%20of%20psychiatrists%20who,0.001%29%20but%20did
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970619/#:~:text=A%20total%20of%202%2C532%20clinical,adjusted%20odds
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970619/#:~:text=From%20a%20financial%20standpoint%2C%20no,the%20cost%20of%20health%20care
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970619/#:~:text=of%20factors,8%7D%20In%20a%20similar