How to Start a Telehealth ADHD Practice in Michigan

You’re a psychiatrist or PMHNP who finally got your telehealth setup running. HIPAA-compliant platform? Check. State licenses? Done (after months of paperwork). DEA registration for controlled substances? All set. You’re ready to help ADHD patients who desperately need care.

Then reality hits: Where are the patients?

You list yourself on Psychology Today. You consider Google Ads. Maybe you launch a website and wait for SEO magic to happen. Three months later, you’ve spent thousands on marketing with maybe 2-3 new patients to show for it—and you’re wondering if you made a terrible mistake going into telehealth.

Here’s what most ADHD providers don’t realize until they’re deep in the weeds: patient acquisition for psychiatric telehealth is brutally expensive when you DIY it. And the economics only get worse when you’re prescribing controlled substances, dealing with higher-than-average no-show rates, and competing against venture-backed telehealth startups with million-dollar marketing budgets.

Let’s talk real numbers, real challenges, and what actually works in 2026.

The Hidden Cost of ‘Cheap’ Marketing Channels

When you Google ‘how to market my psychiatry practice,’ you’ll find articles promising that you can acquire patients for pennies on the dollar through SEO, social media, or directory listings. The reality for ADHD telehealth is far different.

The Psychology Today Trap

Most new providers start here—$30/month for a basic listing, maybe $90/month for premium placement. Seems reasonable, right?

The problem: You’re one of 847 psychiatrists in your metro area on that platform. Even if you specialize in ADHD, patients are clicking through dozens of profiles, comparing cash-pay rates, looking at availability. Your conversion rate from profile view to actual booked appointment might be 1-3%.

Do the math: If 100 people view your profile per month and 2 book appointments, you’re paying $15-45 per patient acquisition. Not terrible—but only if those patients actually show up and stay. With ADHD patients showing 38% missed appointment rates (compared to 23% for non-ADHD patients), your effective cost per retained patient climbs fast.

And here’s what the directory sites don’t tell you: Most of those profile views are from patients who are ‘just browsing,’ not ready to commit. They’re comparing your $200 initial evaluation against the $85 one from the cash-strapped early-career therapist down the list. Unless you have sterling reviews (which new practices don’t), you’re often losing on price alone.

The Google Ads Money Pit

‘Just run some Google Ads for ‘ADHD psychiatrist near me,” your tech-savvy friend suggests. ‘How expensive could it be?’

Very. Mental health keywords are among the most expensive in Google Ads. A click for ‘ADHD doctor’ or ‘psychiatrist telehealth’ runs $15-40 depending on your market. And most clicks don’t convert—someone clicks, looks at your site, sees you don’t take their insurance (or that you’re cash-only at $300/visit), and bounces.

Industry data shows that mental health PPC campaigns typically see 2-5% conversion rates from click to booked appointment. Let’s be conservative and say you’re good at this—you get 4% conversion. At $25/click, you need 25 clicks to get one booking. That’s $625 per booked patient.

Now factor in that 20-30% of those booked patients will no-show the first appointment, and another chunk will come once and never return. Your true cost to acquire a long-term ADHD patient through Google Ads could easily be $800-1200 when you account for wasted spend.

Can you eventually optimize your way to better performance? Sure—if you have 6-12 months, $5,000-10,000 to burn through testing, and expertise in conversion rate optimization. Most solo practitioners don’t.

The SEO Long Game

‘Build a great website and rank organically,’ says every marketing guru. Sound advice—in theory.

Here’s what it actually takes to rank for ‘ADHD psychiatrist [your city]’:

• A well-designed, mobile-optimized website ($2,000-5,000 to build, or months of your time if DIY)
• Regular blog content (at least 2-4 articles per month on ADHD topics)
• Local SEO optimization (Google Business Profile, citations, reviews)
• Backlink building (getting other healthcare sites to link to you)
• Technical SEO maintenance

Even if you do everything right, it takes 6-12 months minimum to start seeing meaningful organic traffic. Google doesn’t care that you need patients next month to cover your overhead.

The all-in cost of a serious SEO effort—whether you hire an agency ($1,500-3,000/month) or do it yourself (40+ hours/month of work you’re not getting paid for)—means you’re investing $10,000-30,000 before you see ROI. And there’s no guarantee you’ll rank above the established practices that have been building their SEO for years.

For a new ADHD telehealth practice, this timeline is often a business killer.

Free consultations available with select providers only.

Grow your practice on Klarity

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

Start seeing patients

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

Why ADHD Telehealth Marketing is Even Harder

If you’re treating depression or anxiety via telehealth, you have challenges. But ADHD adds unique layers of complexity:

The Controlled Substance Stigma

Let’s be honest: The telehealth ADHD industry got a black eye from the Cerebral and Done Health scandals. When those VC-backed startups got investigated by the DEA for questionable prescribing practices, it spooked both regulators and the public.

Now when you advertise ADHD services, you’re fighting perception that ‘online ADHD treatment = pill mill.’ You need to market your legitimacy—board certification, thorough evaluations, conservative prescribing—which requires more content, more trust-building, more touchpoints than a typical mental health practice.

That means higher acquisition costs across every channel.

The No-Show Economics

We mentioned the 38% missed appointment rate for adults with ADHD. Let’s walk through what this does to your marketing ROI.

Say you acquire 10 new ADHD patients at $100 each through a pay-per-lead service (we’ll get to those in a minute). That’s $1,000 in marketing spend.

• 2-3 of those patients no-show their first appointment entirely
• 1-2 come once and ghost
• Maybe 5 become regular patients

Your effective cost per actual patient is now $200, not $100. And if you’re in a cash-pay model where patients are paying $150-250 per follow-up, even one no-show per week costs you $600-1000/month in lost revenue—revenue you need to fund more marketing.

This is why ADHD-focused practices must have robust reminder systems, flexible scheduling, and often need to overbook slightly just to hit their target patient volume. All of which adds operational complexity and cost.

The Insurance vs. Cash-Pay Dilemma

If you take insurance, your reimbursement for a 15-minute ADHD med check might be $70-120. Not great, but you can fill your schedule through insurance directories and referrals. The trade-off: endless prior authorizations for stimulants, lower margins, and you’re stuck in networks that might take months to credential you.

If you go cash-pay, you can charge $150-300 per visit and avoid insurance headaches. But now you need to convince patients to pay out-of-pocket in a market where everyone’s used to $20 copays. Your marketing has to work much harder to justify premium pricing—you need social proof, strong branding, content that demonstrates expertise.

Many ADHD providers end up in an awkward middle: not enough volume from cash-pay marketing to sustain the practice, but insurance reimbursement too low to justify the administrative burden. It’s a profitability trap, and it’s driven by inadequate patient acquisition strategy.

What Actually Works: Platform Economics vs. DIY Marketing

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: For most psychiatrists and PMHNPs starting an ADHD telehealth practice, trying to DIY your marketing is a money-losing proposition for the first 12-18 months.

You have two realistic paths:

Path 1: Invest $15,000-40,000+ in building your own patient acquisition machine

This means:

• $3,000-5,000 website build
• $2,000-3,000/month marketing agency or consultant
• $1,000-2,000/month ad spend while you test and optimize
• 6-12 months before it’s self-sustaining
• Your time managing all of this (opportunity cost of not seeing patients)

If you have the capital, risk tolerance, and long-term vision, this can work. You’ll eventually own your patient relationships, your brand, and your acquisition channels. You’re building equity in your practice.

But most providers can’t afford to operate at a loss for a year while they build this infrastructure.

Path 2: Leverage a platform that handles patient acquisition for you

This is where pay-per-appointment models come in—and where you need to understand the economics clearly.

Platforms like Zocdoc pioneered the pay-per-booking model: you pay a fee (typically $50-180 depending on specialty and market) when a new patient books through their marketplace. There are no upfront costs, no monthly subscriptions. You only pay when a patient actually schedules.

Here’s the value proposition: Instead of spending $2,000/month on marketing with uncertain results, you pay a flat fee per booked patient. The platform handles:

• Search advertising (they’re bidding on ‘ADHD psychiatrist’ keywords)
• Patient matching (filtering patients by insurance, location, availability)
• Booking infrastructure (online scheduling, reminders)
• Initial lead qualification

The catch everyone focuses on: ‘But I’m paying $100+ per patient! That’s expensive!’

Compare it to the alternative:

• Google Ads: $625+ per booked patient (and you’re doing all the work)
• SEO: $10,000+ invested before first patient (and 6-12 month wait)
• Psychology Today: $30/month but terrible conversion rates and you’re competing with everyone

When you frame it correctly, paying $80-150 for a pre-qualified, pre-scheduled patient who’s already matched to your availability and specialty is often the most cost-effective channel, especially early on.

The problem with platforms like Zocdoc is that you still pay if the patient no-shows (it’s a booking fee, not a show-up fee), and you’re sharing the marketplace with competitors. You don’t own the patient relationship—Zocdoc does.

The Klarity Model: Pay-Per-Appointment Without the Platform Tax

This is where Klarity Health’s approach is different—and why it’s worth understanding if you’re building an ADHD telehealth practice.

Full disclosure: Klarity is a telehealth platform specifically for psychiatry and mental health prescribers. But the model matters because it solves the core economic problem of patient acquisition.

How it works:

• No upfront costs or monthly subscriptions
• You pay a standard listing fee per new patient appointment (not just booking—completed appointment)
• Patients are pre-qualified and matched to your specialty, availability, and insurance acceptance
• Platform handles all the marketing, technology, and patient acquisition
• You control your schedule—you decide when you’re available and how many patients you want

Why the economics work:

1. You only pay for patients who actually show up. Unlike Zocdoc’s booking fee that charges you even if the patient ghosts, you’re paying for completed visits. Given ADHD’s high no-show rates, this immediately improves ROI.

2. Pre-qualified patients. These aren’t cold leads from Google who are just browsing. They’ve already been matched to ADHD treatment, verified their insurance (if relevant), and selected your availability. Conversion rates are dramatically higher.

3. No platform competition. You’re not listed alongside 50 other psychiatrists fighting on price. Klarity’s matching algorithm connects patients to providers based on fit, not who has the most reviews or lowest cost.

4. Handles both insurance and cash-pay. Unlike many platforms that force you into one model or the other, you can serve both populations—maximizing your potential patient pool without doubling your operational complexity.

5. Built-in telehealth infrastructure. You’re not paying separately for an EHR, video platform, e-prescribing, and scheduling tool. It’s all included, which eliminates the typical $200-400/month in SaaS costs for a telehealth stack.

The listing fee per patient is comparable to Zocdoc or other pay-per-appointment services, but because you’re only paying for completed visits and the patient quality is higher, your effective cost per retained patient is often 40-60% lower.

The math:Let’s say you see 40 new ADHD patients per month through Klarity at a $100 listing fee each (hypothetical—actual fees vary by market and specialty). That’s $4,000 in patient acquisition cost.

If your average ADHD patient stays for 12 months with monthly follow-ups at $150 each:

• Lifetime value per patient: $1,800 (12 visits × $150)
• Customer acquisition cost: $100
• LTV:CAC ratio: 18:1

That’s sustainable economics. You’re netting $1,700 per patient over their lifetime after paying for acquisition. Compare that to spending $4,000/month on an agency with uncertain results, or $800+ per patient through Google Ads with 30% no-show rates.

Even better: As your schedule fills and you build a base of recurring ADHD patients, you can dial down how many new patients you accept, reducing your monthly acquisition costs while maintaining revenue from follow-ups.

The Real Question: Build vs. Buy

Here’s how to think about your patient acquisition strategy:

Build your own marketing if:

• You have $20,000+ capital to invest upfront
• You can operate at reduced income for 6-12 months
• You have marketing expertise or can afford a high-quality agency
• You’re playing the long game (3-5 year vision)
• You want to build a brand and own your patient relationships completely

Use a pay-per-appointment platform if:

• You need patient flow in weeks, not months
• You want predictable, variable costs (only pay when you see patients)
• You’d rather focus on clinical work than marketing optimization
• You’re starting out or scaling and can’t afford marketing risk
• You value the infrastructure (EHR, telehealth, scheduling) being handled for you

Most successful ADHD telehealth providers do both: They use a platform like Klarity to build their initial patient base and cash flow, while simultaneously investing in their own website, content, and referral relationships. Over 18-24 months, they shift the mix—platform provides 60-70% of new patients early on, then gradually shifts to 30-40% as their owned channels mature.

The fatal mistake is trying to DIY everything from day one with no runway, burning through savings while waiting for SEO to kick in or Google Ads to ‘figure itself out.’

State-Specific Considerations for ADHD Telehealth Marketing

One more layer of complexity: ADHD telehealth patient acquisition varies dramatically by state, based on licensing, prescribing rules, and market saturation.

California: Massive market (40 million people), severe psychiatrist shortage, but not an Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) member. Getting licensed takes 4-6+ months and costs $800-1200 in fees. Once you’re licensed, competition is fierce in metro areas (LA, SF, San Diego), but demand vastly exceeds supply. Cash-pay rates are higher ($250-400 for initial evaluations), but patients expect premium service. Marketing costs are higher—Google Ads might run $30-50/click in competitive markets.

Texas: IMLC member (easier to add to your license portfolio), huge market (30 million people), severe psychiatrist shortage (ranked 43rd nationally—only 1 psychiatrist per 8,966 residents). High demand for ADHD services, especially in Austin, Dallas, Houston. More price-sensitive market than California—expect lower cash-pay rates ($150-250 range). Good opportunity for insurance-based practices, as many employers are expanding telehealth mental health benefits. PMHNPs need physician supervision for prescribing, which can complicate telepractice setups.

Florida: Recently joined IMLC (2024), plus offers a special Telehealth Provider Registration for out-of-state doctors—making it relatively easy to access. Huge market (22 million people), snowbird population creates seasonal demand spikes. The key: Florida law allows out-of-state telehealth providers to prescribe Schedule II stimulants for psychiatric conditions, which is more permissive than many states. This makes Florida an attractive target for national telehealth platforms. Competition is increasing fast, but psychiatrist shortage (1 per 8,577 residents) means demand is strong.

New York: Not IMLC member, but actually one of the fastest licenses to obtain (6-8 weeks if paperwork is in order). Dense provider concentration in NYC, but many don’t take insurance—creating opportunity for new providers who will accept Medicaid or commercial plans. Telehealth parity laws are strong, and reimbursement rates are decent. The challenge: High patient expectations (they’re used to seeing top academic psychiatrists) and competition from established practices. Marketing needs to emphasize credentials and expertise.

Pennsylvania & Illinois: Both IMLC members, moderate-to-good psychiatrist ratios in urban areas but severe shortages in rural regions. Telehealth is your entry point to underserved markets. Strong insurance markets (both states have robust Medicaid telehealth coverage). Marketing opportunity: Position yourself for rural communities where patients might drive 90+ minutes to see a psychiatrist in person, or just go without treatment. Local SEO targeting smaller cities (Scranton, Harrisburg, Peoria, Rockford) can work because competition is lower.

The strategic takeaway: If you’re building a multi-state ADHD telehealth practice, prioritize states where (a) you can get licensed quickly/cheaply, (b) prescribing rules are clear and permissive, and (c) psychiatrist shortage is severe. Texas and Florida are typically highest ROI for new practices. California is lucrative but expensive to enter. New York is fast to license but competitive.

And if you’re using a platform that handles multi-state compliance and patient acquisition, you can scale across states without needing to build separate marketing campaigns for each—that’s a huge operational advantage.

The Bottom Line: Stop Wasting Money on Marketing Theater

Most psychiatrists and PMHNPs waste thousands of dollars on what I call ‘marketing theater’—activities that feel like marketing but don’t actually acquire patients cost-effectively.

Posting on Instagram about ADHD tips? Marketing theater (unless you’re spending on ads and tracking conversions).

Having a beautiful website that gets 50 visitors a month? Marketing theater.

Attending networking events hoping for referrals? Might work eventually, but it’s not scalable patient acquisition.

Here’s what actually matters:

1. Getting in front of people actively searching for ADHD treatment right now
2. Converting those people into booked appointments efficiently
3. Delivering great care so they stay and refer others

For step 1 and 2, you have two options: Spend $15,000-40,000 building your own acquisition machine over 12-18 months, or leverage a platform that’s already built it and pay only for results.

Neither is ‘better’ in absolute terms. It depends on your capital, timeline, risk tolerance, and vision.

But what definitely doesn’t work is half-assing both approaches—spending $500/month on scattered marketing tactics while hoping something sticks, and wondering why you’re not growing.

If you’re serious about building an ADHD telehealth practice that actually generates income (not just expenses), you need to make a clear strategic choice about patient acquisition.

For most providers in 2026, the smart money is on starting with a platform that removes patient acquisition risk entirely—letting you focus on clinical work and cash flow—while building your owned marketing assets in parallel. Within 18-24 months, you have the best of both worlds: reliable patient flow from the platform plus growing organic channels you control.

The worst choice? Trying to DIY everything with no experience, no budget, and no timeline—and burning out before your marketing ever has a chance to work.

Ready to Skip the Trial and Error?

If you’re a psychiatrist or PMHNP licensed (or able to get licensed) in California, Texas, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, or Illinois, and you’re interested in building an ADHD-focused telehealth practice without gambling on unproven marketing tactics, explore Klarity Health’s provider network.

You’ll get:

• Pre-qualified ADHD patients matched to your availability
• Pay-per-appointment model (you only pay for completed visits, not bookings or leads)
• Both insurance and cash-pay patient flow
• Built-in telehealth platform, EHR, and e-prescribing
• Multi-state compliance handled
• No upfront costs or monthly subscriptions

It’s the fastest path from ‘I want to do ADHD telehealth’ to ‘I have a full patient schedule’—without betting your savings on Google Ads or waiting a year for SEO to work.

FAQ: ADHD Telehealth Provider Marketing & Economics

How much does it really cost to acquire an ADHD patient through Google Ads?

Realistically, $400-800+ per booked patient when you factor in click costs ($15-40 per click in competitive markets), low conversion rates (2-5% is typical for mental health), and testing/optimization costs. Your true cost per retained patient (after no-shows and one-time visitors) is often $800-1200. Most solo providers don’t have the budget or expertise to make PPC profitable.

Is SEO worth it for a new ADHD telehealth practice?

Long-term, yes—if you can afford the 6-12 month timeline and $10,000-30,000 investment before seeing ROI. SEO takes consistent content creation, technical optimization, and backlink building. You won’t rank for competitive terms like ‘ADHD psychiatrist [city]’ for many months. For new practices that need patient flow now, SEO should be a parallel investment while you use other channels (like platforms or PPC) for immediate volume.

What’s better for ADHD telehealth: cash-pay or taking insurance?

Depends on your market and goals. Cash-pay offers higher revenue per visit ($150-300+), no prior authorization headaches, and flexibility in care delivery—but you’re limited to patients who can afford it, and your marketing costs are higher (you’re convincing people to pay out-of-pocket). Insurance brings higher volume through directories and referrals, lower patient costs (improving show rates and adherence), but lower reimbursement ($70-120 per med check), administrative burden, and credentialing delays. Many successful practices do hybrid: accept a few major insurance plans to build volume, plus cash-pay for premium services or patients whose insurance doesn’t cover you.

How do I handle ADHD patients’ high no-show rates?

ADHD patients miss appointments at nearly double the rate of non-ADHD patients (38% vs 23% annually). Mitigate this with: automated reminders (text/email 24hrs before, then 2hrs before), same-day confirmation calls, flexible rescheduling (don’t penalize them harshly for one missed appointment—ADHD symptoms drive this), and telehealth (removes transportation barriers). Some providers implement no-show fees for cash-pay patients (e.g., charge 50% of session fee) after second no-show, or require credit card on file. For platform-based practices, choose services that only charge you for completed appointments, not just bookings—this shifts no-show risk away from you.

Can I prescribe Adderall and other stimulants via telehealth in 2026?

Yes, with caveats. The DEA extended COVID-era telehealth prescribing flexibilities through 2025, allowing providers to prescribe Schedule II controlled substances (stimulants) via telemedicine without an initial in-person visit. As of early 2026, these rules are still in effect, but the DEA may implement new requirements (potentially a ‘special registration’ system or requiring some in-person visits for ongoing treatment). State laws vary: California treats video exams as equivalent to in-person for ADHD prescribing. Florida explicitly allows it for psychiatric conditions. Texas requires audio+video (not phone-only). Always check your state medical board and DEA rules, as this is a rapidly evolving area. Maintain thorough documentation of your telehealth visits (informed consent, identity verification, clinical assessment) to demonstrate compliance.

What’s the difference between pay-per-appointment platforms like Zocdoc vs. subscription marketing?

Pay-per-appointment (e.g., Zocdoc): You pay a fee ($50-180 typically) each time a new patient books through the platform. No upfront costs, immediate patient flow, but costs scale with volume and you still pay if patient no-shows. Good for quickly filling a new practice, but can get expensive long-term. You’re also competing with other providers on the marketplace.

Subscription marketing: You pay a fixed monthly fee (e.g., $300-2000/month for directory listing, agency services, or ad management). Easier to budget, and cost per patient decreases as volume grows. But you pay regardless of results, and it often takes months to optimize. Better for established practices with steady income.

Many providers start with pay-per-appointment to jumpstart volume (accepting the higher per-patient cost), then transition to subscription/owned marketing for sustainable long-term growth.

Is Klarity Health worth it compared to building my own practice marketing?

Depends on your situation. Choose Klarity (or similar platforms) if: you need patients in weeks not months, you want predictable variable costs (only pay per completed appointment), you’d rather focus on clinical work than marketing, or you’re starting out without capital for big marketing investment. The platform handles patient acquisition, technology, and compliance—you just see patients.

Build your own marketing if: you have $20,000+ to invest upfront, can operate at lower income for 6-12 months while building, have marketing expertise or can hire a great agency, and want to own your brand/patient relationships long-term.

The smartest approach for most providers: Use a platform to get immediate patient flow and cash flow, while simultaneously building your own website, content, and referral sources. Over 18-24 months, shift the mix so you’re less dependent on the platform and have diversified acquisition channels.

Which states are easiest to get licensed for ADHD telehealth?

Fastest/easiest: New York (6-8 weeks, straightforward process), Florida (IMLC member + telehealth registration option), Texas (IMLC member, though requires jurisprudence exam).

Slower/harder: California (4-6+ months, not IMLC member, rigorous requirements), though the market is lucrative once you’re in.

Best for multi-state practice: Focus on IMLC member states (currently 37 states including Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois). You can use one IMLC application to expedite licenses across multiple states. California and New York require full individual applications, but both are large markets worth the effort if you’re building nationally.

Also consider state prescribing rules: Florida’s exemption for psychiatric Schedule II telehealth prescribing is unusually permissive and makes it attractive for ADHD-focused practices.

Sources

1. University of Bath. ‘New study reveals high rates of missed GP appointments among patients with ADHD.’ Press release, July 9, 2024. https://www.bath.ac.uk/announcements/new-study-reveals-high-rates-of-missed-gp-appointments-among-patients-with-adhd/

2. Mirage News. ‘Research Finds High ADHD Patient No-Show Rates.’ July 10, 2024. https://www.miragenews.com/research-finds-high-adhd-patient-no-show-rates-1271911/

3. Zocdoc. ‘How Zocdoc’s Pay-Per-Booking Model Works.’ Official Blog, December 17, 2025. https://www.zocdoc.com/blog/facts/pay-per-booking-fees-explained/

4. PatientGain. ‘Zocdoc Pricing Guide: PatientGain vs ZocDoc.’ Marketing analysis, 2024. https://www.patientgain.com/zocdoc-pricing

5. PsychMD Georgia. ‘Direct Psychiatry vs Insurance-Based Care: What’s the Difference?’ Blog article, June 3, 2025. https://psychmdga.org/blog/direct-psychiatry-vs-insurance-based-care-whats-the-difference/

Source:

• https://credentialing.org/blogs/medical-license-requirements-by-states-usa/#:~:text=Doctors%20must%20hold%20a%20state,depend%20on%20where%20you%20apply
• https://imlcc.com/information-for-states/#:~:text=The%20Compact%20currently%20includes%2037,became%20operational%20in%20April%202017
• https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/how-long-to-get-licensed-in-tx-nc-fl-or-ca.1367650/#:~:text=Allot%20yourself%204,states%20to%20get%20licensed%20in
• https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/how-long-to-get-licensed-in-tx-nc-fl-or-ca.1367650/#:~:text=It%20took%20me%20nearly%209,for%20my%20long%20wait%20though
• https://compacts.csg.org/compact/interstate-medical-licensure-compact/#:~:text=,2024
• https://compacts.csg.org/compact/interstate-medical-licensure-compact/#:~:text=Idaho%20%20%20,2017
• https://compacts.csg.org/compact/advanced-practice-registered-nurse-compact/#:~:text=,2022
• https://www.axios.com/2024/11/18/covid-telehealth-prescribing-extended-adderall#:~:text=The%20Drug%20Enforcement%20Administration%20,controlled%20substances%20like%20Adderall%20without
• https://denverfamilycounselingservices.com/new-adhd-prescription-laws-2025/#:~:text=The%20new%20system%20coming%20in,person%20for%20controlled%20substance%20prescriptions
• https://denverfamilycounselingservices.com/new-adhd-prescription-laws-2025/#:~:text=California%E2%80%99s%20ADHD%20medication%20laws%2C%20for,patient%20relationship