SitemapKlarity storyJoin usMedicationServiceAbout us
fsaHSA & FSA accepted; best-value for top quality care
fsaSame-day mental health, weight loss, and primary care appointments available
Excellent
unstarunstarunstarunstarunstar
staredstaredstaredstaredstared
based on 0 reviews
fsaAccept major insurances and cash-pay
fsaHSA & FSA accepted; best-value for top quality care
fsaSame-day mental health, weight loss, and primary care appointments available
Excellent
unstarunstarunstarunstarunstar
staredstaredstaredstaredstared
based on 0 reviews
fsaAccept major insurances and cash-pay
Back

Published: Mar 8, 2026

Share

BetterHelp Alternatives for Prescribers

Share

Written by Klarity Editorial Team

Published: Mar 8, 2026

BetterHelp Alternatives for Prescribers
Table of contents
Share

You’re tired of paying for Psychology Today and getting low-quality leads. Or maybe you’re getting plenty of inquiries, but half of them are looking for weekly therapy when you only do medication management. Sound familiar?

Here’s the reality: over 50% of U.S. counties have no psychiatrist. The bottleneck isn’t patient demand—it’s connecting with the right patients who actually need psychiatric medication management. For general psychiatrists and PMHNPs, choosing the right patient acquisition platform can mean the difference between a full practice of appropriate patients and a waitlist full of mismatches.

Let’s break down the real alternatives to Psychology Today, what they actually cost, and which ones deliver patients ready for medication management—not just therapy shoppers.

Why Psychiatrists Are Looking Beyond Psychology Today

Psychology Today has been the default mental health directory for years. At $29.95/month, it’s affordable exposure to millions of potential patients. The platform drives about 34.8 million monthly visits, and psychiatrists in competitive markets report getting 5-15 new patient inquiries per month—working out to roughly $2-6 per lead.

That’s objectively cheap marketing. So why are psychiatrists exploring alternatives?

The Psychology Today reality check:

  • You’re competing with thousands of therapists. In major metros like NYC or LA, hundreds of providers appear in search results. Unless you actively manage your profile (updating it frequently, toggling ‘accepting patients’ status), you sink to page 3 where no one looks.
  • Lead quality varies wildly. Many inquiries come from people expecting weekly psychotherapy or those shopping for the cheapest option. You’ll spend time responding to messages from patients who ghost after learning you don’t take their insurance or that you focus on meds, not talk therapy.
  • It’s entirely passive. Psychology Today gives you visibility—nothing more. You handle screening calls, scheduling, payment collection, insurance verification, and no-show management. For busy prescribers, this administrative burden eats into clinical time.
  • No built-in telehealth infrastructure. If you’re practicing via telemedicine (which most psychiatrists now do at least part-time), you’re cobbling together your own tech stack—video platform, e-prescribing, billing software.

Psychology Today works. For $30/month, it’s almost always worth maintaining a profile as baseline marketing. But it rarely fills a practice on its own, and the patients it delivers require significant filtering.

Free consultations available with select providers only.

Grow your practice on Klarity

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

Start seeing patients

Free to list. Pay only for new patient bookings. Most providers see their first patient within 24 hours.

The Real Economics of Patient Acquisition (What No One Tells You)

Before we dive into platform comparisons, let’s talk about the actual cost of acquiring psychiatric patients—because the numbers you see in marketing ads are often fantasy.

The DIY marketing trap: Many providers think they can just ‘do SEO’ or ‘run Google Ads’ and acquire patients for $30-50 each. Here’s what that actually looks like:

  • SEO takes 6-12 months of consistent investment (quality content, technical optimization, backlinks) before you see meaningful patient flow. Most solo psychiatrists don’t have the expertise or patience.
  • Google Ads for mental health keywords cost $15-40+ per click. Most clicks don’t convert to booked patients. A realistic cost per booked patient through PPC is $200-400+ when you factor in testing, optimization, and conversion rates.
  • Psychology Today directories charge monthly but you compete with hundreds of other providers on the same page—and you still do all the work converting leads.
  • Zocdoc charges $35-110 per new patient booking, but total monthly costs including the subscription add up fast if you’re trying to fill a practice.

When you add up agency fees, ad spend testing, staff time to handle leads, no-show rates from cold inquiries, and months of investment before results, the true cost of DIY patient acquisition is typically $200-500+ per patient. And that’s if you know what you’re doing.

The platform alternative: Pay-per-appointment models like Klarity shift this entire risk equation. Instead of spending thousands upfront with uncertain results, you pay only when a qualified patient actually books with you. The patient has already been screened for appropriate needs (medication management, not therapy), matched to your specialty and availability, and committed with a deposit to reduce no-shows.

This isn’t about which is ‘cheaper’—it’s about guaranteed ROI versus gambling on marketing channels. For most providers, especially those starting out or scaling, a platform that handles patient acquisition removes the risk entirely.

Platform Comparison: What Actually Works for Psychiatrists

Zocdoc: High-Intent Patients, High Fees

The model: Patients search for psychiatrists by insurance, location, and availability—then book appointments directly through the platform. You pay $35-110 per new patient booking depending on specialty and region.

What works:

  • Patients are serious (they’ve filtered by insurance and are ready to schedule)
  • Strong presence in major metros (NYC, LA, Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Philly)
  • Immediate calendar visibility—patients see your next available slot
  • About 60% of Zocdoc’s 100k+ listed providers accept government or commercial insurance, making this a strong channel for in-network practices

What doesn’t:

  • Fees add up fast. In competitive markets, you might pay $80-100 per new patient. If half don’t return for follow-ups, your acquisition cost doubles.
  • Heavy urban focus—if you’re outside major metro areas, Zocdoc may not even operate in your region
  • Some doctors call it ‘cutting into profit margin’—you’re essentially paying a commission on every new patient

Best for: Established psychiatrists in major cities who accept insurance and want to fill their calendar quickly with patients ready to book.

Real talk: Zocdoc is almost mandatory in New York if you take insurance. One NYC doctor told Crain’s he was frustrated with the per-booking fees but acknowledged ‘there isn’t an alternative’ with the same patient reach. The platform works, but you pay for that access.

BetterHelp / Talkspace: Great for Therapists, Wrong for Prescribers

The reality: BetterHelp has served over 5 million people and has 34,000+ therapists in its network. Talkspace is similarly massive. But here’s the catch: these platforms do not support medication prescribing.

BetterHelp explicitly states their therapists cannot prescribe medication. While the parent company has started working with affiliated psychiatrists for separate psychiatric services, the core BetterHelp platform is therapy-only.

If you’re a psychiatrist who enjoys doing psychotherapy and wants extra patients at $30-50 per session (typical BetterHelp compensation), you could join as a therapist. But you’d be giving up your most valuable skill—prescribing—and earning far less than private practice rates.

Best for: Therapists wanting volume and flexibility. Not relevant for medication management psychiatrists.

Cerebral: High Volume, High Turnover, Mixed Reviews

The model: Cerebral is a subscription-based telepsychiatry company that exploded during COVID by offering ADHD, anxiety, and depression medication delivered to your door. Providers join as contractors and see patients assigned by the platform.

What initially worked:

  • Quick path to a full caseload of patients seeking medication management
  • Platform handles all marketing, enrollment, telehealth tech, EMR, and pharmacy integration
  • Remote work from anywhere (seeing patients in multiple states where you’re licensed)

What went wrong:

  • Regulatory scrutiny: In May 2022, Cerebral stopped prescribing Adderall and other controlled substances to new patients amid DEA investigation into prescribing practices
  • Provider burnout: Indeed reviews (2.9/5 rating for psychiatrists) cite ‘constant change/restructuring,’ being ‘told how to prescribe,’ high patient volume with short appointments (30-min intakes, 15-min follow-ups)
  • Clinical autonomy concerns: Non-clinical managers influencing treatment decisions; some providers felt pressured to follow specific medication protocols
  • Compensation issues: While avoiding the upfront marketing costs, providers report lower per-patient pay than private practice

Best for: Providers who want guaranteed patient volume and don’t mind working within a company structure with less clinical independence. Understand you’re essentially working for Cerebral, not building your own practice.

State consideration: Cerebral had huge presence in Florida due to that state’s explicit allowance for telehealth prescribing of Schedule II substances for psychiatric treatment—one of the few states with such clear permission.

Talkiatry: The Virtual Group Practice Model

The model: Talkiatry is a psychiatrist-led virtual practice that employs or contracts with psychiatrists and PMHNPs. They handle patient acquisition, insurance credentialing, scheduling, billing, and admin—you focus purely on clinical work.

What works:

  • Full-service model—they fill your calendar with insured patients (strong insurance network participation)
  • Longer appointments than some telehealth startups (60-min intakes, 30-min follow-ups)
  • Psychiatrist-led leadership (co-founded by a psychiatrist)
  • Active in major states including NY, NJ, FL, TX, PA—targeting insurance markets with panel access issues

What providers report:

  • Base salary concerns: $120-150k full-time base is on the lower side for psychiatry; RVU-based bonuses require very high patient volume to reach
  • Workload issues: Indeed reviews mention ‘no administrative or clinical support, high volume of patients, no clinical screening’
  • Work-life balance: Difficulty taking time off since it directly impacts productivity bonuses
  • Overall sentiment: Glassdoor rating of 3.1-3.4/5 with only 52% willing to recommend to a friend

One Talkiatry psychiatrist review explicitly noted: ‘Compensation isn’t adequate for amount of clinical and admin work’—referencing base salary with bonus structure requiring high throughput to hit.

Best for: Providers who want W-2 employment stability, benefits, and don’t want to handle practice management. Understand the trade-off is lower compensation per patient than private practice in exchange for zero marketing effort.

Real talk: Talkiatry is very effective for patient acquisition—if you join, you’ll have a full caseload quickly. The question is whether the compensation and volume expectations work for your career goals.

Klarity Health: Pay-Per-Appointment, Pre-Qualified Patients

The model: Klarity operates on a fundamentally different approach—no monthly subscription fees for providers. Instead, you pay only when you see a patient, typically through a revenue-share or flat fee per appointment model.

How it works differently:

  • Pre-qualified patients: Klarity markets directly to patients seeking specific psychiatric care (ADHD, anxiety, insomnia, depression medication management). Patients complete intake questionnaires before being matched to providers.
  • Deposit system: Patients pay a $10 non-refundable deposit for initial visits, with the remainder charged 24 hours before the appointment. This dramatically reduces no-shows and casual inquiries.
  • Full infrastructure included: Telehealth video platform, e-prescribing integration, payment processing, scheduling—all handled
  • Both insurance and cash-pay: Depending on your practice, Klarity can funnel either type of patient
  • You control your schedule: Unlike Talkiatry where you’re expected to maintain certain hours, you set your availability and only pay when slots fill

What this means for your practice:

  • Zero upfront risk: If you get no patients from Klarity, you pay nothing. Compare this to spending $3,000-5,000/month on marketing with uncertain results.
  • Higher quality leads: Patients have already been screened as seeking medication management (not therapy), they’ve committed financially (deposit reduces no-shows by ~60-70% compared to cold calls), and they’re matched to your specialty
  • Predictable economics: You know exactly what you’ll pay per patient, so you can calculate whether the revenue from that patient’s visits (including ongoing follow-ups for medication management) justifies the acquisition cost

The trade-off: Like Zocdoc, you’re paying for each patient—the platform takes a portion of revenue. This reduces your margin per visit compared to a patient who finds you organically through Psychology Today. But the volume, quality, and infrastructure often more than compensate.

Best for: Psychiatrists and PMHNPs who want to fill their practice quickly with appropriate medication management patients, without gambling on marketing spend or dealing with administrative burden. Particularly strong for ADHD-focused practices given Klarity’s specialization.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Where Should You Invest?

FeaturePsychology TodayZocdocTalkiatryCerebralKlarity
Cost Model$29.95/month flat$35-110 per new patient bookingW-2 salary (~$120-150k base + RVU bonus)Contract/salary (varies)No monthly fee; pay per appointment (revenue share or flat fee)
Patient Volume5-15 inquiries/month (competitive areas)High (metro areas)High (full caseload guaranteed)Very high (but high turnover)Moderate to high (depends on your availability)
Lead QualityMixed (lots of therapy-seekers; requires screening)High (insurance-verified, ready to book)High (pre-screened by platform)Moderate (high volume, short appointments)Very high (pre-qualified for medication management, deposit reduces no-shows)
Administrative BurdenAll on you (scheduling, screening, billing, no-show management)Moderate (booking automated, but you handle rest)Minimal (platform handles everything)Minimal (platform handles everything)Minimal (platform handles scheduling, payments, telehealth tech)
Tech InfrastructureNone (you provide your own telehealth, EMR, billing)Booking system onlyFull (EMR, video, billing, e-prescribing)Full (proprietary systems)Full (video platform, e-prescribing, payment processing)
Clinical AutonomyCompleteCompleteModerate (some protocols/volume expectations)Low (company prescribing guidelines, management oversight)High (you control treatment; platform just handles logistics)
Insurance vs CashYour choice (you set it)Primarily insurance-basedInsurance-focused (in-network model)Mixed (subscription model, some insurance)Both (you choose)
Geographic ReachStatewide (wherever you’re licensed)Major metro areas onlyMulti-state (where they operate)Multi-state (wherever licensed)Multi-state (wherever you’re licensed)
Best Use CaseBaseline visibility for any practice; good for private-pay/cash practicesUrban psychiatrists taking insurance who want quick calendar fillsProviders wanting employment stability with zero marketing effortProviders okay with high volume and company structure for guaranteed caseloadProviders wanting performance-based patient acquisition without upfront costs or admin burden

Real Provider Economics: What Makes Sense for Your Practice

Let’s run the numbers on a typical scenario:

Scenario: General psychiatrist doing medication management, mix of ADHD/anxiety/depression

Psychology Today approach:

  • Cost: $360/year ($30/month)
  • Patient acquisition: ~8 patients/month convert to appointments (being conservative)
  • Total: 96 new patients/year
  • Cost per patient: ~$3.75
  • But: You spend 5-10 hours/month screening inquiries, responding to messages, managing no-shows
  • True cost when including your time: Significantly higher

Zocdoc approach:

  • Cost: $70/patient average (mid-range)
  • Patient acquisition: 4 new patients/week = ~16/month (realistic for active metro practice)
  • Total: 192 patients/year
  • Total cost: $13,440/year
  • Benefit: Patients are pre-verified insurance, serious about booking, minimal screening needed

Klarity approach:

  • Cost: Revenue share or per-appointment fee (let’s say 20% of visit fee as example)
  • You charge $250 for intake: Platform keeps ~$50, you net $200
  • Patient acquisition: 3 new patients/week = ~12/month
  • Total: 144 patients/year
  • Total cost: $7,200/year (144 × $50)
  • Benefit: Zero upfront spend, pre-qualified patients seeking medication management, full tech stack included, deposit system reduces no-shows

The real question isn’t which is cheapest—it’s ROI:

  • Psychology Today gives you the cheapest cost-per-lead, but you do all the work and many leads don’t convert
  • Zocdoc gives you high-intent patients ready to book, but you pay premium prices per patient
  • Klarity gives you qualified medication management patients with zero upfront risk and full support, at a middle-ground cost

For most general psychiatrists, the answer is: use multiple channels strategically. Maintain a Psychology Today profile as baseline visibility ($360/year is negligible). If you take insurance and practice in a major metro, add Zocdoc to fill urgent slots. If you want to scale quickly without marketing overhead, partner with a platform like Klarity that handles the full patient acquisition funnel.

State-Specific Considerations: Where You Practice Matters

Your choice of platform isn’t just about features—it’s about whether the platform can even operate effectively in your state.

California

  • Not in Interstate Medical Licensure Compact: Out-of-state providers must get full CA license to see California patients
  • NP independence coming: As of January 1, 2026, experienced PMHNPs can apply for full independent practice authority—expanding the pool of providers who can join platforms independently
  • Market reality: High demand but fierce competition in LA/SF Bay Area. Psychology Today very saturated. Platforms like Klarity that handle pre-qualification valuable here to cut through noise.
  • Platform fit: Zocdoc works well in metros for insurance patients. Cash-pay ADHD treatment platforms (Klarity, Done) found huge market in California’s tech worker population.

Texas

  • IMLC member: Easier for physicians to get licensed if already compact-eligible
  • NP restriction: PMHNPs must have Prescriptive Authority Agreement with physician—complicates solo practice
  • Telehealth: Broadly allowed; no in-person requirement if standard of care met via video
  • Market reality: Huge underserved areas. Many Texans rely on telehealth for psychiatry access.
  • Platform fit: Platforms that handle NP supervision (like Talkiatry’s employment model) work better than pure directories. Zocdoc popular in Houston/Dallas/Austin. Klarity’s model works well for reach into suburban/rural areas where traditional marketing fails.

Florida

  • Unique telehealth registration: Out-of-state licensed physicians can register to practice telehealth in FL without full license
  • Explicit controlled substance allowance: Florida law permits telehealth prescribing of Schedule II substances for psychiatric treatment—one of the clearest state permissions
  • NP restriction: PMHNPs excluded from autonomous practice (still need physician collaboration)
  • Market reality: Massive demand (growing population, retirees, limited supply). Telehealth platforms exploded here.
  • Platform fit: This is why Cerebral, Done, Klarity all had huge Florida presence. Easy licensing + controlled substance flexibility = ideal telehealth market. For providers, Florida offers both volume and regulatory friendliness.

New York

  • Not in IMLC: Must get full NY license (no shortcuts)
  • NP semi-independence: Experienced NPs (3,600+ hours) can practice without written agreement, extended through 2026
  • Market reality: NYC incredibly saturated; upstate severely underserved
  • Platform fit: Zocdoc practically mandatory in NYC for insurance practices—one doctor said ‘there isn’t an alternative’ with same reach. Talkiatry headquartered here and has major presence. Psychology Today useful but competitive. For upstate, any telehealth platform valuable to reach isolated patients.

Pennsylvania

  • IMLC member: Good hub state for multi-state practice
  • NP restriction: Physician collaboration required (no full practice authority yet)
  • Telehealth law: Finally passed in 2024, formalizing coverage and practice standards
  • Market reality: Philly/Pittsburgh have providers; central PA severely underserved
  • Platform fit: Psychology Today works for urban self-pay. Platforms handling supervision arrangements (employment models) better for NPs. Telehealth crucial for rural reach—big opportunity for platforms serving outside metro areas.

Illinois

  • IMLC member: Easy multi-state expansion
  • NP full practice: After 4,000 hours, PMHNPs can get independent practice authority
  • Market reality: Chicago has supply but still high demand; downstate very underserved
  • Platform fit: Zocdoc used heavily in Chicago. Many independent PMHNP practices have emerged thanks to FPA—directories like Psychology Today see lots of NP profiles. Platforms can easily recruit independent NPs here without supervision complexity.

The Bottom Line: Which Platform Should You Choose?

If you’re starting a private practice:Start with Psychology Today ($30/month) as baseline visibility. It’s cheap insurance that someone searching your area finds you. Add a Google Business Profile (free). If you’re in a major metro and take insurance, consider Zocdoc to fill your calendar faster—just budget for the per-patient fees.

If you want to scale quickly without marketing headaches:Partner with a pay-per-appointment platform like Klarity. You avoid the $3,000-5,000/month marketing spend gamble, get pre-qualified patients actually seeking medication management, and only pay when you’re earning. The built-in infrastructure (video, e-prescribing, payment processing) saves you from cobbling together multiple tools.

If you want employment stability:Talkiatry or similar group practices offer W-2 employment, benefits, and guaranteed patient flow. Understand the trade-off: lower compensation per patient and higher volume expectations, but zero practice management burden.

If you’re in a telehealth-friendly state (Florida, Texas):Take advantage of regulatory flexibility. Florida’s explicit controlled substance permission for psych telehealth and out-of-state registration option make it ideal for expanding reach. Platforms operating there can serve broad populations efficiently.

What I’d avoid:

  • Paying for multiple subscription directories that overlap (pick one or two max)
  • Platforms that are therapy-focused when you’re doing medication management (BetterHelp, GoodTherapy)
  • Over-investing in DIY marketing before you understand the true economics and time commitment

The hybrid approach most psychiatrists use:

  • Maintain Psychology Today profile (baseline visibility, minimal cost)
  • List on Zocdoc or join an insurance network if you take insurance (fills calendar with serious patients)
  • Partner with a performance-based platform like Klarity for additional qualified patients without upfront risk
  • Rely on referrals and word-of-mouth as your practice matures

The key insight: patient acquisition for psychiatrists isn’t about finding the single perfect platform—it’s about strategically using multiple channels based on your practice model (insurance vs cash), location (metro vs rural), and growth stage (starting vs established).

Psychology Today will always be part of the mix because it’s affordable and ubiquitous. But in 2026, the psychiatrists building full practices fastest are those who combine cheap baseline visibility with performance-based platforms that deliver pre-qualified patients ready for medication management—without the marketing gamble.

FAQ

Is Psychology Today worth it for psychiatrists in 2026?
Yes, for $30/month it’s worth maintaining as baseline visibility. You’ll likely get at least a few inquiries monthly—even in competitive markets. Just understand it requires active profile management and lead screening on your end. It works best as one channel among several, not your sole marketing strategy.

What’s the real cost per patient with Zocdoc?
Zocdoc charges $35-110 per new patient booking depending on specialty and region. For psychiatry in major metros, expect to pay $60-100 per patient. The upside: these are serious patients who’ve filtered by insurance and are ready to schedule. The downside: costs add up quickly if you’re trying to fill a full practice.

Can PMHNPs use these platforms independently?
It depends on your state. In states with full practice authority (Illinois, New York for experienced NPs, California by 2026), yes—you can join any platform independently. In states requiring physician collaboration (Texas, Florida for psych NPs, Pennsylvania), you’ll need a supervising physician arrangement, which some platforms handle (employment models like Talkiatry) and others don’t (directories like Psychology Today just list you, but you must have the legal collaboration separately).

How do pay-per-appointment platforms like Klarity compare to monthly subscriptions?
Monthly subscriptions (Psychology Today at $30, or some practice management tools) are fixed costs regardless of results. Pay-per-appointment means you only pay when you actually see a patient—shifting the risk to the platform. For providers nervous about marketing spend or those scaling up, performance-based pricing often makes more sense. You might pay more per patient than a $30/month directory, but you’re guaranteed the patient is qualified and booked.

What about controlled substance prescribing via telehealth—is that legal?
As of early 2026, yes, under the DEA’s temporary extension of COVID-era flexibilities (extended through December 31, 2025, with further extensions expected). Florida has explicit state law allowing telehealth prescribing of Schedule II substances for psychiatric treatment. Other states defer to federal rules. This is in flux—monitor DEA final rules expected in 2026. The likely outcome is either continued permission with certain safeguards, or a requirement for one initial in-person exam. Most platforms are preparing hybrid models (partner clinics for in-person visits) to comply with whatever rules emerge.

Do these platforms work outside major metro areas?
It varies. Zocdoc is primarily metro-focused (NYC, LA, Chicago, etc.)—outside those areas, it may not even operate. Psychology Today works everywhere since it’s a passive directory patients find via Google. Telehealth platforms like Klarity, Talkiatry, Cerebral work statewide (wherever you’re licensed) and are especially valuable in rural/underserved areas where patients have no local options. If you practice in a smaller city or rural area, telehealth platforms are often more effective than local directories.

Should I join multiple platforms?
Most successful psychiatrists use 2-3 channels strategically. For example: Psychology Today for baseline visibility + Zocdoc for insurance patients in your metro + Klarity for additional pre-qualified medication management patients. Avoid paying for multiple overlapping subscription directories (pick one or two max), but combining a directory with a performance-based platform often makes sense.


Ready to Fill Your Practice With Pre-Qualified Patients?

If you’re tired of sorting through Psychology Today inquiries from people looking for free therapy or spending thousands on marketing that may or may not work, there’s a better way.

Klarity Health connects psychiatrists and PMHNPs with patients specifically seeking medication management—ADHD, anxiety, depression, insomnia. No monthly fees. No wasted ad spend. No gambling on whether your SEO will work in 8 months.

You pay only when a qualified patient books with you. The patient has already been screened, they’ve committed with a deposit (reducing no-shows by 60-70%), and you get the full telehealth infrastructure included—video platform, e-prescribing, payment processing.

Join Klarity’s Provider Network →

Set your availability, see the patients you’re best equipped to treat, and skip the marketing headaches entirely. It’s performance-based patient acquisition done right.


Sources

  1. Osmind Blog. ‘How to Attract More Patients to Your Psychiatry Practice.’ Osmind.org, 2023. https://www.osmind.org/blog/how-to-attract-more-patients-psychiatry-practice

  2. Sivo Health Marketing. ‘How Much Does a Psychology Today Listing Cost?’ Blog.Sivo.it.com, July 17, 2025. https://blog.sivo.it.com/professional-practice-marketing/how-much-does-a-psychology-today-listing-cost/

  3. Emitrr. ‘Is Zocdoc Worth It? Pricing and Features Explained.’ Emitrr.com, Updated November 14, 2025. https://emitrr.com/blog/zocdoc-pricing/

  4. Fierce Healthcare. ‘Some New York Doctors Unhappy About Zocdoc’s New Pricing Model.’ FierceHealthcare.com, August 28, 2019. https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/practices/some-new-york-doctors-unhappy-about-zocdoc-s-new-pricing-model-company-says-it-was

  5. The Mental Desk. ‘Can BetterHelp Therapists Prescribe Medication?’ TheMentalDesk.com, Updated March 20, 2024. https://www.thementaldesk.com/can-betterhelp-therapists-prescribe-medication/

  6. TapTwice Digital. ’11 BetterHelp Statistics (2025).’ TapTwiceDigital.com, April 2, 2025. https://taptwicedigital.com/blog/better-help-stats

  7. Business Wire. ‘BetterHelp Surpasses 5 Million People Benefiting from Online Therapy Service.’ BusinessWire.com, January 22, 2025. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250122456222/en/BetterHelp-Surpasses-5-Million-People-Benefiting-from-Online-Therapy-Service

  8. Indeed. ‘Working at Cerebral: Employee Reviews.’ Indeed.com, Accessed January 2026. https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Cerebral/reviews

  9. Indeed. ‘Working at Talkiatry: Employee Reviews.’ Indeed.com, Updated January 24, 2026. https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Talkiatry/reviews

  10. Glassdoor. ‘Talkiatry Reviews.’ Glassdoor.com, Accessed January 2026. https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Talkiatry-Reviews-E5847393.htm

  11. Texas Medical Board. ‘Prescribing and Supervision Requirements.’ TMB.Texas.gov, Current 2026. https://www.tmb.texas.gov/resources/for-applicants-and-licensees/prescribing-and-supervision

  12. Florida Statutes. ‘Telehealth (456.47).’ FlSenate.gov, 2023 Edition. https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2023/456.47

  13. NPSchools. ‘Guide to Nurse Practitioner Practice in Florida.’ NPSchools.com, November 2022. https://www.npschools.com/blog/guide-to-np-practice-in-florida

  14. JD Supra (Rivkin Radler). ‘NYS Maintains Independent Practice Rights for Experienced Nurse Practitioners.’ JDSupra.com, April 23, 2024. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/nys-maintains-independent-practice-5085341/

  15. National Conference of State Legislatures. ‘Scope of Practice Policy: Pennsylvania.’ NCSL.org, Updated 2021. https://www.ncsl.org/scope-of-practice-policy/state/pennsylvania

  16. CompHealth. ‘Interstate Medical Licensure Compact: Member States 2026.’ CompHealth.com, January 8, 2026. https://comphealth.com/resources/interstate-medical-licensure-compact

  17. Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health. ‘Pennsylvania Finally Passes Telemedicine Law.’ PORH.PSU.edu, July 1, 2024. https://www.porh.psu.edu/pennsylvania-finally-passes-telemedicine-law/

  18. California Board of Registered Nursing. ‘AB 890 Implementation: Nurse Practitioner Practice Authority.’ RN.ca.gov, Current 2026. https://rn.ca.gov/practice/ab890.shtml

  19. Klarity Health Support. ‘Is There a Membership or Monthly Subscription Fee?’ Support.HelloKlarity.com, Last modified February 13, 2025. https://support.helloklarity.com/support/solutions/articles/66000487673-is-there-a-membership-or-monthly-subscription-fee-

  20. Klarity Health. ‘Billing and Cancellation Policy.’ HelloKlarity.com, Last modified February 13, 2025. https://www.helloklarity.com/billing-and-cancellation-policy

Source:

Get expert care from top-rated providers

Find the right provider for your needs — select your state to find expert care near you.

logo
All professional services are provided by independent private practices via the Klarity technology platform. Klarity Health, Inc. does not provide medical services.
Phone:
(866) 391-3314

— Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM PST

Mailing Address:
1825 South Grant St, Suite 200, San Mateo, CA 94402

Join our mailing list for exclusive healthcare updates and tips.

Stay connected to receive the latest about special offers and health tips. By subscribing, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
logo
All professional services are provided by independent private practices via the Klarity technology platform. Klarity Health, Inc. does not provide medical services.
Phone:
(866) 391-3314

— Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM PST

Mailing Address:
1825 South Grant St, Suite 200, San Mateo, CA 94402
If you’re having an emergency or in emotional distress, here are some resources for immediate help: Emergency: Call 911. National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: call or text 988. Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741.
HIPAA
© 2026 Klarity Health, Inc. All rights reserved.